human rights

PIL – Threat to JUDGE

S.O.S e – Voice For Justice – e-news weekly
Spreading the light of humanity & freedom
Editor: Nagaraja.M.R.. Vol.11..Issue.23……..06/06/2015

Retired Judge Jyotsana Yagnik Threatened; Murder Convicts Out On Bail
– An Appeal to Government of Gujarath , Natioanl Human Rights
Commission & Supreme Court of India

To ,

1.Honourable Supreme Court of India , New Delhi

2.National Human Rights Commission , New Delhi

Dear Madam / Sir ,

Subject : Threats to JUDGE

The civil society organizations and concerned citizens have taken
serious note of a news report (IE May 11, 2015) about the intimidation
of a retired judge, Ms Jyotsana Yagnik, who, in her capacity as
special judge had, in August 2012, convicted former Gujarat BJP
minister Maya Kodnani, former Bajrang Dal leader Babu Bajrangi and 30
others in the 2002 massacre of 97 Muslims in Naroda Patiya. Ms Yagnik
has received at least 22 threat letters since the verdict, as well as
blank phone calls at her home. The 62 year old judge has informed the
Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team about the threats
and phone calls, but instead of strengthening her protection, the
government has scaled down her security cover. The SIT convenor and
Additional DIG of Police has denied knowledge of the letters,
according to the news-report. Meanwhile convict Maya Kodnani,
condemned to life imprisonment as principal conspirator in a massacre,
has been out on bail since mid-2014, and convict Babu Bajrangi,
sentenced to imprisonment till death is now about to enjoy three
months bail for medical treatment.

The Indian criminal justice system is being politically degraded with
every passing day. With regard to the violence in Gujarat in 2002,
there have been instances of several encounter-accused policemen being
re-instated and cases against them being quietly dropped. Meanwhile in
Maharashtra, there is no sign that the murderers of Narendra Dabholkar
and Gobind Pansare will ever be caught. In Bihar, the acquittals of
those accused of massacring Dalits in Shankarbigha and Bathani-tola
show that the justice system is incapable or unwilling to punish those
who commit mass crimes. Now we have an upright judge being threatened,
whilst murder convicts guilty of heinous crimes are out on bail, and
suspended policemen obtain re-instatement.

An onslaught on justice is taking place in broad daylight. It is now
clear that the Modi-led government finds India’s criminal justice
system and independent judiciary to be an obstacle blocking its
long-term plans. The incidence of prejudice in the courts is nothing
new – the 1984 pogrom inaugurated a new era in the erosion of Indian
justice. The NDA government has given impetus to this process. The
ideological hooligans of the so-called ’Sangh parivar’ are convinced
they are above the law. Corruption does not merely have monetary
implications. The erosion of judicial independence taking place before
our eyes is also corruption. Building trustworthy public institutions
is a prolonged process that takes decades. But they can be destroyed
very rapidly, especially when state power is used (covertly or
openly), to intimidate judges like Ms Jyotsna Yagnik.

Criminals these days feel free to physically intimidate the judiciary,
and the police appear to be treating it as a minor matter. Threatening
a judge exemplifies a fascist mentality. Politicised justice breeds
hatred and despair among its victims. Those who manipulate justice, on
the other hand, are announcing their profound contempt for the very
value of justice. They are sending all of us a sinister message –
justice is whatever we say it is. Let us remind ourselves, therefore,
that if justice becomes a device for strengthening one political group
at the expense of others, for eliminating enemies and assisting
allies, law will have cast off even the mask of neutrality. If
judicial decisions become predictable, this can only mean that the
judiciary has been compromised and hooliganism has entered the working
of the state at the highest levels. Only an alert public can defeat
this kind of politics.

By undermining the citizens’ faith in a fearless judiciary, the
elimination of law will threaten the very foundations of the
democratic state. All elected representatives should remember that the
Constitution is the fundamental statute of the Indian Union, which
protects us from violent and tyrannical behaviour by criminals and/or
persons in power. If they keep silent in the face of the ongoing
sabotage of justice, our MP’s and MLA’s shall be betraying their oath
of office. We ask all judicial, police & IAS officials to remember
their oath of loyalty to the Indian Constitution.

In light of the above, we demand that the Gujarat government take
immediate steps to ensure Ms Jyotsana Yagnik’s safety, and investigate
the threats she has received. If any harm comes to this judge, the
Gujarat government and its patron at the Centre will be held
responsible by public opinion.

We call upon all democratic civil society organizations and concerned
individuals to launch a campaign to strengthen the criminal justice
system and the autonomy of the judiciary. Instances of the perversion
of justice by any party, official or civil, should be highlighted and
resisted. Hereby , we appeal to Honourable Supreme Court of India &
NHRC to protect the above judge from ruling junta.

Your’s sincerely ,

Nagaraja Mysore Raghupathi ,

Editor , SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice

Rethinking Rule Of Law In The Times Of Rape Bid On A Judge
By Samar

An attempt to rape a judge, that too in Judges’ Compound in Aligarh
which remains under twenty four hour vigil of the Provincial Armed
Constabulary speaks volumes about the status of law and order in Uttar
Pradesh, the most populous state of India. Who will be safe on the
streets when even a judge is not spared by the rapists? No one, in
fact is, as evidenced by the recent spate of incidents of sexual
violence against women from marginalised and dispossessed backgrounds.
The gruesome gang rape and murder of two minors in Badaun, the most
ghastly of them, has caused a national outrage just a few days before
this incident. The brazen attack on the mother of a rape survivor in
order to force her to withdraw the complaint against the accused,
currently in jail, in nearby Etah was another glaring example of total
collapse of rule of law in Uttar Pradesh.
Sadly, the state has never been known for maintaining even law and
order, forget enforcing rule of law. It has rather had the dubious
distinction of being the proverbial Bad Lands, the countryside run by
might and not by rulebooks. With both political and bureaucratic
leadership oscillating between the denial to dodging mode, the recent
cases of sexual assaults have merely reinforced the image. Think of a
Chief Minister saying that rapes were common and a Google search would
return many “Badaun like incidents’. Think of his father, a former
chief minister and current parliamentarian, terming rape as minor
mistake. The Director General of Police of the state, however, took
the crown by justifying the incidents of rape as ‘normal’ in a state
of the size and population of Uttar Pradesh.
There were others, largely in the secular liberal intelligentsia of
the country, who saw a political conspiracy hatched by the Hindu right
behind defaming the state. They came up, rightly, with the data from
the National Crime Records Bureau that shows Madhya Pradesh as the
rape capital of India and raised questions over the undue scrutiny of
Uttar Pradesh. The intelligentsia, unfortunately, seems to have got it
wrong once again, first time being its silence on the cases where
victims came from dispossessed and marginalised communities. The lack
of outrage over sexual violence against women from Dalit, tribal,
minorities and other such communities until the cases are really gory,
as Badaun was, has led to a section of people losing faith in them, it
would do better not to lose all.
The question, however, is if the failure of a state in providing
security to its women can be used as an excuse to defend the total
collapse of rule of law in another? Should not a single case of rape
be horrifying enough for the state to wake up and fix the system? Can
a state really take refuge in competitive statistics and shirk from
its responsibility of maintaining law and order, at least? This is
exactly where that the government of Uttar Pradesh has failed and
failed absolutely. That’s not bizarre if one sees the number of
criminals in it right from its ranks and files to the ministry. After
all, the state has a dubious distinction of seeking the withdrawal of
rape charges against a minister in ‘public interest’.
It is in this context that the rape attempt on a sitting judge must be
seen as a wakeup call for both the citizenry and the state. No people
can live in perpetual fear of violence against women and state’s
inaction will merely increase both vigilantism and control of the
mobility of women in the name of safety, a dangerous thing for a
democracy. Parrying away the questions over the state of governance in
Uttar Pradesh is not going to serve any purpose, only bringing the
criminals to justice will. The state government must ensure speedy and
impartial justice to the victims and their families to restore their
faith in the system.

Alleging Sexual Harassment By High Court Judge, a Junior Judge Quits

NEW DELHI:  A woman additional judge in Gwalior has resigned alleging
sexual harassment by a judge of the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The
judge asked her to “dance to an item song” and influenced her transfer
to a remote location, she has alleged in a complaint to the President,
the Chief Justice of India and the Union Law Minister.

Chief Justice of India RM Lodha told NDTV on Monday morning, “I
haven’t received the complaint officially… once I get it I will go
through the complaint. Normally we ask for a report on the complaint
from the Chief Justice of the High Court. In this case, I will seek a
report from the Chief Justice of Madhya Pradesh High Court and take
action accordingly. I will do my best for the institution.”

The additional judge resigned on July 15 and wrote to the CJI and
others on August 1, Friday evening. “If this is how a mother, sister
and wife can be treated, who is herself no less than a judicial
officer duty-bound to protect society and law, what constitutional
goals are we serving?” said the woman, who ironically headed a Vishaka
committee against sexual harassment.

She has alleged that the High Court judge constantly pestered her and
once sent her a message through an official to “perform dance on an
item song” at a function at his home. She said she excused herself
saying it was her daughter’s birthday.

She also alleged that when she spurned the judge’s “various advances
and malicious aspirations”, he targeted her professionally. “The
administrative judge, along with district judge and district judge
(inspection), possibly made a false, frivolous, baseless and malicious
reporting to the chief justice of MP and got me transferred on July 8,
in the mid-academic session of my daughters to a remote place Sidhi by
overruling the transfer policy of MP HC,” she has complained.

She said her appeal for an eight-month extension to allow her
daughter’s academic year to finish was rejected and has alleged that
the judge threatened to “spoil my career completely,” when she pleaded
against the transfer.

“I was left with no option but to resign, so, I resigned on July 15 in
compelling, humiliating and disgraceful circumstances to save my
dignity, womanhood, self-esteem and career of my daughter,” she has
written.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF
INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R editor SOS e
Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761
, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,

Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
.

….Petitioner

Versus
Honourable
Chief Justice of India & Others

….Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS
UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.
To ,
Hon’ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship’s Companion
Justices of the Supreme Court of India. The Humble petition of the
Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
“Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All
Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for
power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed.” Sir Winston made this statement in
the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved
right by some of our criminal , corrupt people’s representatives ,
police , public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned judges
fall among the category of churchill’s men – Rogues , Rascals &
Freebooters.
2. Eventhough the information is readily available with SCI ,
information was denied citing unavailability. If at all information is
not truly available , why didn’t the CPIO TRANSFER rti application to
concerned departments of SCI , Ministry of Law , Justice , Respective
High Courts , etc.
3. Does not court administarative officer posess SERVICE REECORDS of
each employee including judges. If not on what basis they give
promotions , transfers , salary , etc to judges ? The person who
posess SR can give infor mation about guilty judges. Why CPIO not
asking that person to share infor mation ?

4. If a commonman is alleged of a petty crime he is immediately
arrested , put behind bars. Police spend thousands of rupees for
investigation to prosecute that petty criminal. Judges spend hours to
hear that case & prepare judgements running into tens of pages
sometimes even over & above thousand pages. Fine . When the very same
police & judge themselves committ grave crimes detrimental to national
security , integrity , etc , no arrests , no prosecution only cover-up
, WHY ? Are Judges & Police above Law ? Is Judge’s MAFIA at play ?
5. The action of CPIO SCI amounts to cover up of judges & their
crimes. Thereby , CPIO is also committing a crime. With respect to
previous RTI Appeals also CPIO & RTI First Appellate Authority SCI
have repeatedly committed crimes by covering up judges & their crimes.
Billions of indians are barely sustaining on a single piece meal a day
, we lower middle class people toiling hard to earn a few hundreds of
rupees but still paying tax. Is it not shame to them / shame to JUDGEs
that they draw pay & perks amounting to lakhs of rupees from our money
, from taxes paid by us still not do their constitutional duties
properly.
2. Question(s) of Law:
Are Judges above Law & can go scot free ?
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , free expression & protection to life & liberty.
4. Averment:
GIVE WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN AGAINST THE GUILTY JUDGES MENTIONED IN
THE BELOW MENTIONED WEB SITES & FOLLOWING ARTICLES.
We salute honest few in public service , Judiciary , police ,
parliament & state legislative assemblies. our whole hearted respects
to them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN
STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS – WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie
answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT
THE OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND
, LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE
VIOLATING PEOPLE’S FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE
HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN
APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN
PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD &
CRIMINALS. I HAVE SHOWN IN DETAIL WITH LIVE , ACTUAL CASES , EXAMPLES
, HOW INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM IS MANIPULATED BY CRIMINALS WITHIN JUDICIARY
, POLICE , PROSECUTION , ETC. READ DETAILS AT :
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,
Atrocities on Women by JUDGES
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges
A – Z of Manipulation of Indian Legal System
http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,
http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,
Justice Sathasivam – Are you DEAF DUMB & BLIND
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/justice-sathasivam—are-you-deaf-dumb-blind
,
Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Cover-up
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rajiv-gandhi-assassination-cover-up
,
SHAME SHAME MPs & MLAs
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/shame-shame-mps-mlas ,
JUDGEs or Brokers of Justice
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-or-brokers-of-justice ,
RTI & Land Golmaal
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rti-land-golmaal-in-karnataka
,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,

Hereby , we do request CPIO O/O Honourable Chief Justice of India ,
Supreme Court of India , New Delhi to answer the following questions
in public interest , for safeguarding national security , National
unity & integrity & to legally apprehend anti-nationals , criminals
within the judiciary & police. Judges are not superior human beings ,
some of them have even became judges through devious means other than
merit , integrity. Judges are public servants drawing salary & perks
from public exchequer and accountable to public as any other common
man is.
We salute our freedom fighters , military personnel & martyrs for all
the sacrifices made by them. Let us build a strong , Secular ,
Democratic India by getting rid off few corrupt elements , anti
nationals , traitors among public servants , among judiciary & among
police who are greater threat to India’s unity & integrity than
Pakistani terrorists or chinese military.
Information input forms part of process of one’s expression. One’s
expression in any forms – written , oral , etc becomes information
input to the opposite person , in turn he expresses his reply.
Information & Expression are inseparable parts & form lifeline of a
democracy. That is the reason , Right to Expression is the basic
fundamental right as well as human right of every Indian citizen. When
a person’s right to expression is violated , his other rights to
equality , justice , etc also are violated. Suppression of Information
amounts to curbing of Expression.
In a democracy , people have a right to know how the public servants
are functioning. However till date public servants are hiding behind
the veil of Officials Secrets Act (which is of british vintage created
by british to suppress native indians). By this cover-up public
servants are hiding their own corruption , crimes , mismanagement ,
failures , etc. even RTI Act is not being followed intoto by public
servants. However the recent delhi high court ruling affirming that
CJI is under RTI purview & bound to answer RTI request , is
noteworthy.
Our previous RTI request to CJI , union home secretary of GOI,
President of India , DG & IGP of GOK and others were not honored. The
information I sought were answers to the following questions mentioned
in the below mentioned websites . the questions concerned the past ,
present continuing injustices meted out to millions of Indian citizens
, due to wrong / illegal work practices of Indian judges , police &
public servants . The information we sought would expose the traitors
, anti-nationals , criminals in public service. The information we are
seeking are no defense secrets , no national secrets. The truthful
information exposes the anti-nationals , traitors in the public
service & strengthens our national security , national unity &
integrity.
Please read RTI First Appeal to following public authorities :
1. RTI Appellate Authority , O/O Chief Justice of India , Supreme
Court of India , New Delhi.
2. RTI Appellate Authority , o/o RBI Governor , RBI HQ , Mumbai
3. RTI Appellate Authority , o/o Chief Minister , Government of
Karnataka , Vidhana Soudha , Bangalore.
4. RTI Appellate Authority , BSNL Corporate office , New Delhi.

Hereby , i do request the honourable supreme court of india , for a
Supreme Court monitored CBI Enquiry into this whole issue as karnataka
police are helpless , they don’t have legal powers to prosecute high &
mighty , constitutional functionaries. They have not even enquired the
guilty VVIPs even once however Under pressure from higher-ups they
repeatedly called me the complainant to police station took statements
from me all for closing the files.
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider
this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to
the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their
duties & to answer the questions.
The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme
court of india & other courts through e-mail , DARPG website & through
regular mail requesting them to consider those as PILs. But none of
them were admitted , even acknowledgement for receipts were not given.
See How duty conscious ,our judges are & see how our judges are
sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens , commonmen & see how
careless our judges are towards anti national crimes , crimes worth
crores of rupees.
That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which
are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of
India on the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased:
(i) Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to
consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue
instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases
to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
(ii) to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed
necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Dated : 03rd June 2015
FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

Place : Mysuru  , India
PETITIONER-IN-PERSON
Enclosed :
RTI First Appeal to following public authorities :
1. RTI Appellate Authority , O/O Chief Justice of India , Supreme
Court of India , New Delhi.
2. RTI Appellate Authority , o/o RBI Governor , RBI HQ , Mumbai
3. RTI Appellate Authority , o/o Chief Minister , Government of
Karnataka , Vidhana Soudha , Bangalore.
4. RTI Appellate Authority , BSNL Corporate office , New Delhi.

To ,

RTI Appellate Authority ,

O/O Chief Justice of India ,

Supreme Court of India ,

New Delhi.

APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA &
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.

ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,

EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,

# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,

HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,

HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN – 570017.

“Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All
Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for
power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed.” Sir Winston made this statement in
the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved
right by some of our criminal , corrupt people’s representatives ,
police , public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned judges
fall among the category of churchill’s men – Rogues , Rascals &
Freebooters.

Eventhough the information is readily available with SCI , information
was denied citing unavailability. If at all information is not truly
available , why didn’t the CPIO TRANSFER rti application to concerned
departments of SCI , Ministry of Law , Justice , Respective High
Courts , etc.

Does not court administarative officer posess SERVICE REECORDS of each
employee including judges. If not on what basis they give promotions ,
transfers , salary , etc to judges ? The person who posess SR can give
infor mation about guilty judges. Why CPIO not asking that person to
share infor mation ?

If a commonman is alleged of a petty crime he is immediately arrested
, put behind bars. Police spend thousands of rupees for investigation
to prosecute that petty criminal. Judges spend hours to hear that case
& prepare judgements running into tens of pages sometimes even over &
above thousand pages. Fine . When the very same police & judge
themselves committ grave crimes detrimental to national security ,
integrity , etc , no arrests , no prosecution only cover-up , WHY ?
Are Judges & Police above Law ? Is Judge’s MAFIA at play ?

The action of CPIO SCI amounts to cover up of judges & their crimes.
Thereby , CPIO is also committing a crime. With respect to previous
RTI Appeals also CPIO & RTI First Appellate Authority SCI have
repeatedly committed crimes by covering up judges & their crimes.
Billions of indians are barely sustaining on a single piece meal a day
, we lower middle class people toiling hard to earn a few hundreds of
rupees but still paying tax. Is it not shame to them / shame to JUDGEs
that they draw pay & perks amounting to lakhs of rupees from our money
, from taxes paid by us still not do their constitutional duties
properly.

GIVE WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN AGAINST THE GUILTY JUDGES MENTIONED IN
THE BELOW MENTIONED WEB SITES & FOLLOWING ARTICLES.

We salute honest few in public service , Judiciary , police ,
parliament & state legislative assemblies. our whole hearted respects
to them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN
STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS – WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie
answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT
THE OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND
, LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE
VIOLATING PEOPLE’S FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE
HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN
APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN
PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD &
CRIMINALS. I HAVE SHOWN IN DETAIL WITH LIVE , ACTUAL CASES , EXAMPLES
, HOW INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM IS MANIPULATED BY CRIMINALS WITHIN JUDICIARY
, POLICE , PROSECUTION , ETC. READ DETAILS AT :

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,

Atrocities on Women by JUDGES

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges

A – Z of Manipulation of Indian Legal System

http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,

http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,

Justice Sathasivam – Are you DEAF DUMB & BLIND

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/justice-sathasivam—are-you-deaf-dumb-blind
,

Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Cover-up

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rajiv-gandhi-assassination-cover-up
,

SHAME SHAME MPs & MLAs

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/shame-shame-mps-mlas ,

JUDGEs or Brokers of Justice

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-or-brokers-of-justice ,

RTI & Land Golmaal

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rti-land-golmaal-in-karnataka
,

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,

Hereby , we do request CPIO O/O Honourable Chief Justice of India ,
Supreme Court of India , New Delhi to answer the following questions
in public interest , for safeguarding national security , National
unity & integrity & to legally apprehend anti-nationals , criminals
within the judiciary & police. Judges are not superior human beings ,
some of them have even became judges through devious means other than
merit , integrity. Judges are public servants drawing salary & perks
from public exchequer and accountable to public as any other common
man is.

Please give following information :

Main A :

1. Please give me The address of salary disbursing officer in supreme
court of india. Salary disbursing officer will be maintaining service
records of all employees of supreme court of india including judges.
These records are used for disciplinary action , promotion , transfer
of judges. If not within SCI , please give the address of the outside
public official who maintains service records of supreme court judges
and kindly compile information from him and give it to me orelse
transfer my RTI application to him.

2. Please give me the list of serving as well as retired supreme court
judges with allegations against them and the action taken thereof.
Reasons for taking action / criminal prosecution or not taking action.

3. Please give me the list of serving as well as retired high court
judges with allegations against them and the action taken thereof.
Reasons for taking action / criminal prosecution or not taking action.

4. Please give me the list of serving as well as retired district &
taluk court judges with allegations against them and the action taken
thereof. Reasons for taking action / criminal prosecution or not
taking action.

5. Some of the high courts are demanding higher RTI application fees
than stipulated by law. Eventhough requisite fees has been paid before
transfer of RTI application to high courts. Please give me the details
of action taken by supreme court of india against erring high courts.

6. Give me the List of petitions with date made by Shri . Nagaraja
Mysore Raghupathi alias Nagaraja M R TO SUPREME COURT OF INDIA THROUGH
POST , THROUGH E-MAIL & THROUGH website of DPG / DARPG. Action taken
or not taken with reasons thereof with respect to each petition.

7. Please give me list of actions , follow up actions taken by supreme
court of india , to safe guard the HUMAN RIGHTS & FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS
of Nagaraja M R editor of SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for
justice. He repeatedly appealed to SCI highlighting violations of his
human rights & fundamental rights. After appealing to SCI only editor
Nagaraja M R suffered more injustices , attempts on his life , etc ,
may be JUDGE’s MAFIA is in deal with outside MAFIA. Police are
helpless & practically don’t have power to question supreme court
judges & other VVIPs. Did SCI constitute SCI monitored enquiry
committee with full legal authority to look into the issue.

8. Judges preach too much & practice less. They give lectures ,
judgements running into hundreds of pages eliciting legality, moral
virtues , humanity , etc. But cover up information leading to crimes /
accountability of judges. The judges committee like a mafia deals it
within without subjecting the accussed judge to public scrutiny &
public trial. It is almost similar to a whore / bitch giving a lecture
on virginity to women. To refresh your memory , Please go through
following websites to know about facts , actual cases of crimes by
judges. Please give us information regarding action taken or not taken
with reasons there of with respect to each case mentioned in the
following websites:

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges ,

http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,

http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,

9. Please give me the list of actions , follow up actions taken by
supreme court of india to safeguard the human rights of prisoners ,
witnesses & evidences .

10. Please give me the list of actions , follow up actions taken by
high courts of india to safeguard the human rights of prisoners ,
witnesses & evidences .

11. Please give me the list of supreme court judges , high court
judges & district / taluk judges (both serving & retired) who received
favourable allotment of sites , etc which is nothing but a form of
kick back for favours shown by judge. Please give me the list of
action taken or not taken by supreme court of india with reasons
thereof in each case.

12. Please give me the list of action taken against by supreme court
of india against CPIO & PIO of supreme court of india , who repeatedly
failed to give me information . thereby , CPIO & PIO are covering up
crimes of guilty judges , violating RTI Act & violating human rights /
fundamental rights of editor Nagaraja M R together with public.

Main B :

1 . How many judges are booked for graft , sexual crimes , crimes
against women , irregularities , amassing disproportionate wealth ,
failure of duty , getting illegal allotment of sites & other crimes
since independence till date , yearwise ?

2. what action taken casewise ?

3. are the action taken similar to commoners , common people
committing same type of crimes ?

4. did all the cases handled by tainted judges subjected to review ,
retrial by other honest judges ?

5. how many advocates were prosecuted by court for influencing
witnesses / evidences , for tutored / concocted evidences , etc since
independence till date , yearwise ? what action ? if not why ?

6. how many police officials / law enforcing officials were prosecuted
by court for influencing , intimidating witnesses through threats ,
3rddegree torture , for concocted evidences , etc since independence
till date , yearwise ? what action ? if not why ?

7. how many police / law enforcement officials were prosecuted for
lock-up deaths , fake encounters , illegal detention , 3rd degree
torture , etc since independence till date , yearwise ? what action ?
if not why ?

8. in how many cases police / law enforcement officials were made to
pay compensation to innocent victims who were wrongly charged ,
detained & tortured , murdered by police , since independence till
date , yearwise ? what action ? if not why ?

9. in some cases , on appeal judgements of higher court turns down the
judgement of lower court. In how many such cases , lower court judge
is made to pay compensation to victims of their wrong judgement ,
since independence till date yearwise ? what action ? if not why ?

10. how many judges have defaulted in filing their annual financial
returns giving out their wealth , income details , yearwise since
independence till date ? what action ? if not why ?

11. how you are verifying the annual financial returns of judges ?

12. since independence , how many convicts have been sentenced to
“death by hanging” , yearwise ?

13. how many death sentances were carried out & how many are pending ?

14. how many police officials were made to pay compensation &
prosecuted for defamation , when innocents falsely charged by police
were acquitted , dropped from charges by courts ? if not why ?

15. how many lower court judges were made to pay compensation &
prosecuted for defamation , when innocents wrongly convicted by lower
court , but on appeal higher courts acquitting , dropping them of
charges ? if not why ?

16. are judges getting paid from public exchequer , for their expenses
on liquor / alcohol , body massages , etc in their TA DA bill while on
tour , official visits , official parties hosted by judges ?

17. how many appeals for justice concerning public welfare , violation
of human & fundamental rights , threat to lives / livelihood , etc
were made to supreme court of india , by nagaraja mysore raghupathi
alias nagaraja M R alias myself since 1990 till date ? appeals were
made through ordinary post , registered post , e-mail & by web through
DARPG , DPG. What ACTION taken by supreme court of india with respect
to each appeal ?

18. due to negligence / connivance of supreme court judges injustices
were meted out to public & public are still suffering injustices.
Crimes which could have been prevented by SC happened eventhough
brought to early notice of supreme court. What action against erring
SC Judges ? if not why ?

19. I have repeatedly offered my services to supreme court of india ,
to apprehend criminals within judiciary , police & public service.
What action taken by supreme court of india ? if not why ?

20. in my legal struggle for justice , due to negligence / connivance
of SCI judges I have suffered murder attempts on my life , job losses
, my newspaper closed , not getting press accreditation to my web news
papers , threats by rowdies , police , etc. what action against erring
chief justice of india ? if not why ?

21. I repeatedly appealed to supreme court of india to permit me to
appear as amicus curie before supreme court of india & jain commission
of enquiry regarding late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case. I was
not permitted why ?

22. who are the judges covering-up Rajiv Gandhi assassination case ?
what action taken ? if not why ?

23. Law is one & same for all , but law enforcement & law
interpretation is not same for common people , Judges & Police ? why ?

NOTE : PLEASE TAKE NOTE THAT YOUR CONTINUED NEGLIGENCE TO PROVIDE
INFORMATION , JUSTICE TO EDITOR NAGARAJA M R LEADS TO THE THREAT TO
THE LIFE , LIVLIHOOD OF HIMSELF & HIS WHOLE FAMILY. YOU ARE LIABLE TO
PAY COMPENSATION. DON’T TRANSFER THIS CASE , APPLICATION TO POLICE
THEY DON’T HAVE POWER TO ENQUIRE JUDGES LET ALONE TAKE ACTION. PLEASE
ENTRUST THE CASE TO TRANSPARENTLY CONSTITUTED SUPREME COURT MONITORED
ENQUIRY COMMITTEE TO LOOK INTO THE WHOLE ISSUE.

I ,NAGARAJA.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are
true to the best of my knowledge & belief. If i am repeatedly called
to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the
losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation ,
job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB
personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of
injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the
guilty culprits even once to police station for questioning , as the
culprits are high & mighty . this type of one sided questioning must
not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward
happens to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with
hit & run accidents , loss of lives , death due to improper medical
care , etc , the jurisdictional police , revenue officials , District
Magistrate & Chief Justice of India together with above mentioned
accused public servants will be responsible for it. Even if criminal
nexus levels fake charges , police file fake cases against me or my
dependents to silence me , this complaint is & will be effective.

If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental
rights , human rights , denied proper medical care for ourselves , If
anything untoward like hit & run cases , murder attempts , unnatural
deaths , etc happens to me or to my dependents or to my family members
– In such case Chief Justice of India together with the jurisdictional
revenue & police officials will be responsible for it , in such case
the government of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as compensation
to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the
criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian
Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as
land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty
police officials , guilty Judges , guilty public servants & guilty
Constitutional functionaries.

YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR
1995-2015 .

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER WHO FAILED TO GIVE INFORMATION :

CPIO , o/o Chief Justice of India , SUPREME COURT OF INDIA , NEW DELHI.

FEES PAID : IPO 16G 733465 for rupees TWENTY only

DATE : 28.03.2015 ……………..………………………NAGARAJA.M.R.

PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA….. ……………………….( APPLICANT)

To ,

Shri. L.K. Govil ,

GM (Coordination) & RTI Appellate Authority ,

BSNL Corporate office ,

Room No .27 , IR Hall , Eastern Court Complex ,

Jan Path Road , New Delhi – 110001.

APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA &
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.

ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,

EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,

# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,

HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,

HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN – 570017.

“Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All
Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for
power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed.” Sir Winston made this statement in
the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved
right by some of our criminal , corrupt people’s representatives ,
police , public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned DOT
officials fall among the category of churchill’s men – Rogues ,
Rascals & Freebooters. To my previous RTI requests & appeals they
tried covering – up crores worth SCAM by transferring application from
one to the other at the end by denying information to me, Does not the
DOT possess information with respect to tenders given by it to
suppliers. Is it not the duty of DOT QUALITY Circle to monitor the
supplies from suppliers ? Then who has got it ? why don’t you transfer
the RTI application to that authority or ask for information from them
?

We salute honest few in public service , our whole hearted respects to
them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS /
ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS – WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers )
ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT THE
OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND ,
LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE
VIOLATING PEOPLE’S FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE
HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN
APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN
PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD &
CRIMINALS.

M/s Karnataka Telecables Ltd , Mysore renamed as M/s RPG Telecom Ltd
again renamed as M/s RPG Cables Ltd once again renamed as M/s KEC
International , Mysore used to manufacture PIJF & OFC telecables and
supplied it to department of telecommunications , government of india
, Indian Railways and GAIL , PGCIL of Ministry of Petroleum . DOT used
to pay hundreds of crores of rupees from public exchequer to buy these
cables . There is also one more company by name M/s Concepta Cables
Ltd , Mysore belonging to the same industrial group supplying PIJF &
OFC telecables to DOT. As a public , as a citizen of india and as a
tax payer I want to know whether those crores of rupees from public
exchequer are well spent.

1. How many times the above said companies were blacklisted by DOT ,
Supreme Court of India and other quasi judicial bodies , casewise ?

2. What action taken by DOT & judicial bodies against the above
companies , casewise ?

3. How many cable kms of cable supplied by above companies , were
rejected by DOT from the field yearwise , since 1986 ?

4. Did the above companies replace all the cables rejected by DOT &
make good all the losses , yearwise ?

5. If not , why ?

6. What action taken by DOT , casewise ?

7. How many cable kms of cables supplied by above companies were
accepted on deviation by DOT yearwise ? on what basis ?

8. Has the DOT authorised usage of recycled materials in the
manufacture of cables ?

9. If yes , on what basis ?

10. Did DOT authorize outsourcing of cable manufacturing process by
above companies to third parties , casewise ?

11. How many cable kms of telecom cables supplied by above companies
have failed during usage within the warranty period , yearwise ?

12. Did the above companies honour warranty contract in all such cases ?

13. If not why , casewise ?

14. What action by DOT , casewise ?

15. Who maintains records of DOT / BSNL tenders given out to Suppliers
specifically with respect to tenders given to M/s Karnataka Telecables
Ltd , M/s RPG Telecom Ltd , M/s RPG Cables Ltd , M/s Concepta Cables
Ltd & M/s KEC International Ltd ?

16. How may rejections / adverse reports , deviations found in the
supplies made by above companies by DOT / BSNL Quality Circle ?

17. What action taken against BSNL / DOT officials who are trying to
cover-up the scam inspite of my repeated appeals & RTI requests ?

YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR
1995-2015 .

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER WHO FAILED TO GIVE INFORMATION :

CPIO , BSNL HQ , New Delhi.

FEES PAID : IPO 16G 733463 for rupees TWENTY only

DATE : 28.03.2015 ……………..………………………NAGARAJA.M.R.

PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA….. ……………………….( APPLICANT)

To ,

RTI Appellate Authority ,

O/O Chief Justice of India ,

Supreme Court of India ,

New Delhi.

APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA &
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.

ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,

EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,

# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,

HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,

HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN – 570017.

“Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All
Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for
power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed.” Sir Winston made this statement in
the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved
right by some of our criminal , corrupt people’s representatives ,
police , public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned judges
fall among the category of churchill’s men – Rogues , Rascals &
Freebooters.

Eventhough the information is readily available with SCI , information
was denied citing unavailability. If at all information is not truly
available , why didn’t the CPIO TRANSFER rti application to concerned
departments of SCI , Ministry of Law , Justice , Respective High
Courts , etc.

Does not court administarative officer posess SERVICE REECORDS of each
employee including judges. If not on what basis they give promotions ,
transfers , salary , etc to judges ? The person who posess SR can give
infor mation about guilty judges. Why CPIO not asking that person to
share infor mation ?

If a commonman is alleged of a petty crime he is immediately arrested
, put behind bars. Police spend thousands of rupees for investigation
to prosecute that petty criminal. Judges spend hours to hear that case
& prepare judgements running into tens of pages sometimes even over &
above thousand pages. Fine . When the very same police & judge
themselves committ grave crimes detrimental to national security ,
integrity , etc , no arrests , no prosecution only cover-up , WHY ?
Are Judges & Police above Law ?

The action of CPIO SCI amounts to cover up of judges & their crimes.
Thereby , CPIO is also committing a crime. With respect to previous
RTI Appeals also CPIO & RTI First Appellate Authority SCI have
repeatedly committed crimes by covering up judges & their crimes.
Billions of indians are barely sustaining on a single piece meal a day
, we lower middle class people toiling hard to earn a few hundreds of
rupees but still paying tax. Is it not shame to them / shame to JUDGEs
that they draw pay & perks amounting to lakhs of rupees from our money
, from taxes paid by us still not do their constitutional duties
properly.

GIVE WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN AGAINST THE GUILTY JUDGES MENTIONED IN
THE BELOW MENTIONED WEB SITES & FOLLOWING ARTICLES.

At the outset , we express our whole hearted respects to the honest
few public servants in public service including judiciary. However,
the corrupt in public service don’t deserve respect as individuals –
as they are parasites in our legal system. Still we respect the chairs
they occupy but not the corrupt individuals.

All the following articles / issues , whole articles published in the
weblinks mentioned below forms part of this appeal. The term
“JUDGE”mentioned throught includes all public servants discharging
judicial functions right from taluk magistrates , quasi-judicial
officers to Chief Justice of India.

Indian Legal / Judicial System is manipulated at various stages & is
for sale. It is a SHAME. The persons who raise their voice seeking
justice are silenced in many ways. The criminal nexus has already
attempted to silence me in many ways . If anything untoward happens to
me or to my family members , my dependents , Honourable Chief Justice
of India together with jurisdictional police officer will be
responsible for it.

Hereby, we do once again offer our conditional services to the
honourable supreme court of India & other government authorities, in
apprehending criminals including corrupt judges & police. Herewith ,
we once again appeal to the honourable supreme court of India , to
consider this as a PIL Appeal in public interest.

The public servants & the government must be role models in law
abiding acts , for others to emulate & follow. if a student makes a
mistake it is excusable & can be corrected by the teacher. if the
teacher himself makes a mistake , all his students will do the same
mistake. if a thief steals , he can be caught , legally punished &
reformed . if a police himself commits crime , many thieves go scot-
free under his patronage. even if a police , public servant commits a
crime , he can be legally prosecuted & justice can be sought by the
aggrieved. just think , if a judge himself that too of apex court of
the land itself commits crime – violations of RTI Act , constitutional
rights & human rights of public and obstructs the public from
performing their constitutional fundamental duties , what happens ? it
gives a booster dose to the rich & mighty , those in power , criminals
in public service to committ more crimes. that is exactly what is
happenning in india. the educated public must raise to the occassion &
peacefully , democratically must oppose this criminalisation of
judiciary , public service. then alone , we can build a RAM RAJYA OF
MAHATMA GANDHI’S DREAM.

Kindly go through the following articles & provide justice by giving
complete truthful information to us , by publicly answering the
following questionnaire in an unambiguous manner.

The constitution of India has prescribed certain FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES to
each citizens of India. It is the duty of every citizen to protect &
uphold the dignity , honour of our democratic institutions , to
protect our national integrity , to respect & protect the rights of
our fellow citizens. No constitutional authority has the right to
obstruct the discharge of these duties by citizens of India. No legal
privileges of constitutional functionaries is superior over the
FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES OF CITIZEN’S OF INDIA.

We need rights to perform our duties. Constitution of India has
guaranteed those rights as FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS to all citizens of India
& by birth itself everyone of us has secured HUMAN RIGHTS as
individuals. To express ourselves , we need information , data feed
back , to ascertain whether we are getting equal opportunity , whether
we are getting equitable justice , etc , we need information . so ,
basically Right To Information is an inalienable part of our
fundamental rights & human rights. What RTI Act has done is fixed time
limit , responsibilities of public servants up to certain extent.
However the citizen’s fundamental right & human right to seek
information extends far beyond the scope of RTI Act.

Hereby , we seek complete truthful information from supreme court of
India , with respect to my RTI application appeal. HEREBY , WE ARE
ONLY SEEKING ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVANTS IN PUBLIC INTEREST &
JUSTICE. Hereby , we request you to register this appeal as a PIL
petition & to ascertain the stand of apex court on various matters
raised in my RTI Application , in public interest & equitable justice.

We salute honest few in public service , Judiciary , police ,
parliament & state legislative assemblies. our whole hearted respects
to them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN
STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS – WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie
answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT
THE OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND
, LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE
VIOLATING PEOPLE’S FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE
HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN
APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN
PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD &
CRIMINALS. I HAVE SHOWN IN DETAIL WITH LIVE , ACTUAL CASES , EXAMPLES
, HOW INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM IS MANIPULATED BY CRIMINALS WITHIN JUDICIARY
, POLICE , PROSECUTION , ETC. READ DETAILS AT :

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,

Atrocities on Women by JUDGES

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges

A – Z of Manipulation of Indian Legal System

http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,

http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,

Justice Sathasivam – Are you DEAF DUMB & BLIND

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/justice-sathasivam—are-you-deaf-dumb-blind
,

Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Cover-up

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rajiv-gandhi-assassination-cover-up
,

SHAME SHAME MPs & MLAs

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/shame-shame-mps-mlas ,

Hereby , we do request PIO O/O Honourable Chief Justice of India , PIO
, O/O H.E.Honorable President of India , PIO O/O Honorable Speaker of
Lok Sabha , PIO O/O Dy Chairman of Rajya Sabha , PIOs of Karnataka Raj
Bhawan , Karnataka CMO , Union Home Ministry GOI and DG & IG of Police
of Government of Karnataka to answer the following questions in public
interest , for safeguarding national security , National unity &
integrity & to legally apprehend anti-nationals , criminals within the
judiciary & police.

Main A :

1. What action you have taken against judges involved in atrocities
against women , casewise ? if not, why ?

2. What action you have taken against judges involved in land scams ,
casewise ? if not , why ?

3. I have shown with actual cases how manipulation / fixing takes
place , from complaint filing to judicial pronouncement stage. Are the
judges & police , above law ?

4. I have numerous PILs , RTI appeals before supreme court of india.
But they were not registered , not honoured , why ?

5. To my legal notice / show cause notice / damage payment notice to
supreme court of india & chief justice of india , till date I have not
received the reply , why ?

6. Is it not the duty of supreme court of india to protect the life &
liberty of all Indian citizens ?

7. Is it not the failure of supreme court of india, when it failed to
protect the life of a complainant ?

8. By negligence of their duties , are not supreme court judges aiding
& abetting criminals , anti nationals & terrorists ?

9. While crores of Indians are barely surviving on a single piece meal
a day , people dying due to starvation , supreme court judges are
getting salary & perks amounting to lakhs of rupees from the same
suffering public / public exchequer. Are not those duty shirking
judges ashamed ?

10. What action you have taken against judges involved in hushing up
late prime minister rajiv Gandhi assassination case ?

11. Why the supreme court of india didn’t allow me to appear before it
in the said case of late PM Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case ?

12. Why the supreme court of india didn’t protect my life , my job
oppurtunities , my newspaper from the wrath of criminal nexus ?

13. When even cable TV journalists , web journalists are getting PRESS
/ MEDIA accreditation , my web news papers , myself are not getting
PRESS accreditation since 9 years , why ?

14. Are the supreme court judges hand in gloves with the criminal nexus ?

Main B :

You have not taken appropriate action to my previous RTI requests ,
Numerous appeals for justice & police complaints. You have not replied
to show-cause notice also. Your inaction has helped the criminals in
manipulating & destroying evidences.

Your inaction / delay in performing your duties not only amounts to
denial of information , but amounts to violation of our fundamental &
human rights , cover-up of crimes , aiding & abetting criminals . The
criminal nexus tried to silence me in many ways. Is not these acts of
your’s a crime in itself ?

If your acts of crime cover-ups , information / evidence cover-ups ,
aiding & abetting criminals , silencing a crusader is just & legal.
The same type of acts of crimes performed by other citizens will also
be legal ?

Main C :

At the outset , we express our whole hearted respects to all
constitutional institutions & to the honest few in public service.
Contempt of constitutional institutions , citizens of India is being
made by the corrupt persons in constitutional positions themselves.
This is an appeal to the honest few in public service , constitutional
positions , to bring their corrupt colleagues to book.

1. does the action of MPs , MLAs taking money / receiving favors from
vested interests , to formulate policy decisions , to raise questions
in parliament / legislative bodies or to abstain from voting legal ?

2. why transparent , fair investigation is not done in such cases ?

3. just remember , the vulgar acts of Mr.Bora Babu Singh in state
legislature & how some MLAs vulgarly behaved with Ms.Jayalalita in
state legislature , years ago. Are these type of vulgar actions by MPs
& MLAs legal ? does not these constitute contempt of the house by MPs
& MLAs themselves ?

4. all the people’s representatives from panchayath member to
president of India must read ABCD Of Democracy provide along
with.since independence of India till date , MPs & MLAs are forcing
projects on people against the wishes of people , formulating policies
against the wishes of people. Are not such projects , government
policies & Laws , undemocratic & illegal ?

5. is the election commission of India verifying the authenticity of
affidavits submitted by electoral candidates ?

6. how many candidates have been caught so far for giving false
affidavits ? are all the violators prosecuted?

7. are the MPs , MLAs submitting their wealth details on affidavits
yearly to vigilance authorities ? defaulters , violators how many ?

8. what legal action taken against violators , defaulters , for giving
false affidavits ?

9. who is checking the authenticity of those affidavits submitted by
MPs , MLAs ?

10. the agricultural incomes of some MPs , MLAs , their kih & kin
raises even during the time of severe drought , floods , fall in
prices of agricultural products , their companies register increase in
turnover / profits even during recession , the trusts / NGOs set up by
them receive huge donations. Are all these income legal ?

Main D :

1. we do once again offer our conditional services to the government
of india , all state governments & supreme court of india , in
apprehending tax evaders , land grabbers , corrupt police , corrupt
judges , corrupt public servants , labor law violators , etc. whom the
the government officials , vigilance authorities have failed to
apprehend. Why the authorities , courts , supreme court of India , are
not ready to utilize our service ? are they afraid of being caught ?

2. the public servants , courts theselves are delaying giving
information / records to us in many cases. So in the issues / cases
raised by us , the clause of time bar doe not apply. Are these
delaying tactics of public servants , courts legal ?

3. why no proper , timely action was not taken based on numerous
police complaints made by us ?

4. why DG & IGP , Government of Karnataka , has not made any efforts
to seek legal sanction for prosecution of VVIPs ( mentioned in our
complaint ) , from union & state home ministries ?

5. the criminal nexus is trying to silence me in many ways , but the
supreme court of India & national human rights commission has failed
to undo the injustices , why ? is it because it is not a high profile
case ? is it because it is not hi-fi , does not get image ratings ,
TRPs ?

6. the public servants are aiding underworld , naxalites & terrorists
, by their delaying tactics & denial of information , records. What
action has been taken against such anti-national elements in public
service ?

7. how many complaints are made by Nagaraj .M.R. , Human Rights
Activist , Mysore (editor of SOS e-clarion of dalit & SOS e-voice for
justice) to Karnataka police , to national human rights commission to
supreme court of India till date ? what action taken with respect to
each complaint ?

8. the delay in taking action by public servants with respect to
following cases has resulted in more crimes , destruction /
manipulation of evidences , records and more injustices to commonman.
Why the authorities did not take timely action against criminals in
following cases ?

SOS Appeal to SUPREME COURT of INDIA
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-
DEALS IN COURTS & POLICE STATIONS READ :
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/satyameva-jayate ,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/01/satyameva-jayate.html ,

ACCUSED Chief Justice of India
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/accused-chief-justice-of
,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/02/accused-chief-justice-of

CROSS EXAM OF HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA , SUPREME COURT OF
INDIA –
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF UNION HOME SECRETARY , GOI , NEW DELHI –
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF DG&IG OF POLICE , GOK , BANGALORE –
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF GOVERNOR , RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/ , http://theftinrbi.rediffblogs.com/
http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/
CROSS EXAM OF MUDA COMMISSIONER , MUDA , MYSORE –
http://crimesofmuda.blogspot.com/ , http://manivannanmuda.blogspot.com/
http://crimesatmudamysore.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF BDA COMMISSIONER , BDA , BANGALORE –
http://crimesofbda.blogspot.com/ , http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/ ,
CORPORATE CRIMES RPG CABLES LIMITED
http://crimesatrpg.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesatrpg.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/218
MEGA FRAUD BY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
are you ready to catch tax thieves ?
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
MOBILE PHONES , CURRENCY SCANDALS
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
reliance industry where is accountability ?
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
crimes at infosys campus
http://crimeatinfy.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimeatinfy.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/214
crimes by B.D.A against a poor woman
http://crimesofbda.blogpot.com/ ,
http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212
crimes of land mafia in India
http://landscamsinindia.blogspot.com/ ,
http://landscam.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212
currency thefts in RBI Press
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/80
killer colas & killer medicines of India
http://deathcola.blogpot.com/ ,
http://deathcola.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/201

HONOR OF INDIAN PALIAMENT FOR SALE

http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/honor-of-indian-parliament-for-sale

Persecuted IROM SHARMILA of Puttaparthi AP – pushpa kolasani on hunger
strike in anantapur district jail Andhra Pradesh

http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/persecuted-irom-sharmila-of-puttaparthi-ap

9. how many judges are caught by authorities for doing improper ,
immoral & illegal acts , since independence till date ? what action
taken in each case ?

10. what action taken against copy cat judges caught red handed while
copying in public examination in Andhra Pradesh ?

11. have you reviewed all the previous judicial decisions taken by
such judges of doubtful integrity & honesty ?

12. is it not the duty of government & supreme court of India , to
protect the fundamental rights & human rights of all Indian citizens ?

13. why the government & supreme court of India has failed to protect
the fundamental rights & human rights of me & those mentioned in my
complaint ?

14. how many former CJIs , supreme court & high court judges have
disproportionate wealth ?

15. Your denial of information to my previous RTI requests amounts to
suppression of evidence , hiding crimes , what action against erring
public servants ?

16. why my previous RTI requests or part there of was not transferred
to appropriate authorities and information given to me in a
consolidated form ?

Main E :

Q1. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who murder people in in
lock-up / fake encounters ?

Q2. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who apply 3rd degree
torture on prisoners ?

Q3. Why not death sentence to corrupt police , who connive with
criminals & backstabs our motherland , it’s national security ?

Q4. Don’t the police have suo-motto powers to take action in the
interest of public welfare , law & order ?

Q5. Daily we see numerous reports of misdeeds by police , public
servants , industrialists , etc in the media . Then why not police
taking any action with respect to them ?

Q6. nowadays we see numerous reports of scams , scandals by
constitutional functionaries , public servants in the media. Instead
of wasting money , killing time by prolonging formation of
parliamentary committees , judicial commissions , why not subject
those accussed public servants to narco analysis , lie deector test ,
etc to ascertain truth & provide timely justice ?
Q7. If a commonman files a complaint , police / courts wants evidences
, witnesses to take action against the rich & mighty crooks. Where as
if a rich person just gives a complaint against a poor chap , he is
arrested , tortured eventhough there are no evidences , witnesses. Why
this double standard ?
Q8. If a poor chap tries to collect evidences as per his fundamental
rights or as per RTI ACT , the public servants don’t give full ,
truthfull information. Still , police / courts don’t take action
against those public servants hiding crimes. Why ?
Q9.why I was not permitted to appear as an “amicus curie” before jain
commission of enquiry or supreme court of india probing late prime
minister rajiv Gandhi assassination case ?
Q10. The criminal nexus tried to silence me , by closing my news paper
, by snatching away my job oppurtunities in government service, by
physically assaulting me , by threatening me of false fix-ups in cases
& by attempts to murder me. But no action against culprits , why ?
Q11. Whereas , I was enquired number of times by police & intelligence
personnel about this case , but the culprits were not enquired even
once , why ?
Q12.who compensates the losses I have suffered due to these injustices
? are not police responsible for it ?
Q13. Is it not the duty of police to protect the lives , livelihood of
witnesses & all parties involved , both during case & afterwards ?
Q14. How do you monitor & check corrupt police personnel & increase in
their family’s wealth year after year ?
Q15. While getting appointed into government service from the rank of
peon to IAS officer , police verification is mandatory. While
appointing to sensitive defense establishments , research institutes
in addition to police verification , central intelligence agencies
cross-check candidate’s background. However is there no background
checks of constitutional functionaries , MPs , MLAs , , who are privy
to national secrets ? why ?
Q16. Recently , the opposition parties have made allegations during
presidential allegations that close relative of one of the front
running candidates have swindled public money by their bank , misused
public money through one of their NGO. Is it true ?
Q17.has GOI funded any terrorist outfits in india or abroad ?
Q18.india preaches non-violence , panchasheel principles to the world.
In india , more than half the population are poor , people are
starving to death. Inspite these background , GOI funded & aided
terrorist outfits in former east Pakistan ensuring the creation of
Bangladesh , GOI has funded & aided terrorist outfits like LTTE , TULF
, ETC in srilanka , MQM in Pakistan. In turn these terrorist outfits
have murdered thousands of innocents in those countries. Are these
acts of GOI just & legal ? Is not GOI responsible for all those
murders of innocents ? has GOI paid any compensation to those victims
or their family mebers ? why not ?
Q19.within india , to reduce the influence of certain terrorist groups
, GOI has funded & aided couter terrorist groups , is it right & legal
?
Q20. In Jharkhand , chattisgarh , etc , the government has armed ,
trained & funded “salwa judum” to counter naxalites. Salwa judum
cadres are terrorizing innocents just like naxalites. Is this action
of government just & legal ?
Q21.in india, TADA , POTA is being rampantly misused by police. Even
where there are no problems of terrorism , TADA / POTA is being
slapped against innocents , even children. In M.M.Hills of Karnataka
state , STF personnel charged tribal people with TADA on frivolous
charges of taking lunch to veerappan , stiching dress for the forest
brigand, etc. where as the prominent political, film , sports
personalities who have links with underworld , anti national elements
& attended parties hosted by dawood Ibrahim , other dons in gulf
countries , else where. But these hi-fi people are not charged with
TADA / POTA ? why ?
Q22. Film actor sanjay dutt had contacts with underworld & fully
knowing well the criminal objectives of criminals , hid the dangerous
arms & ammunition in his home , which were intended for terrorizing
public. However mr.dutt is not charged with TADA / POTA instead he is
charged with illegal possession of arms act ( which is normally
applied to farmers who use illegal home made guns to scare away
animals , birds in their farms ). Why this favourable treatment of
mr.dutt by police ? prosecution ? is this because dutt is politically
mighty & rich ?
Q23. Law is one & same for all , the public servants, police
interpretes , enforces it differentially between rich & poor ? why
this differentiation ?
Q24.recently in Bangalore police nabbed criminals belonging to
international criminal syndicate selling duplicate nokia mobiles.
Every nokia mobile comes with 15 digit IMEI number , this number is
also used by police for tracking criminals. In consumer dispute at
consumer disputes redressal forum Mysore CD 49/05 , nokia company
stated that all it’s products come with IMEI number only & stated that
the product in dispute sold by tata indicom dealer M/S INTOTO
COMMUNICATIONS , Mysore are not their’s as it doesn’t have IMEI
numbers. Further nokia stated they don’t have any business
relationship with either tata indicom or it’s dealer. However the tata
indicom dealer stated that indeed his products are genuine , first
hand products , but doesn’t have IMEI numbers . this proves the dealer
in collusion with tata company is selling illegal nokia mobile hand
sets & cheating the public. These mobiles are evading taxes , as well
as these are without IMEI numbers best buy for criminal elements who
want to evade police tracking. What police are doing
Q25. Who , of which rank among police personnel takes the decision to
close a case ie to file “B” report , when after certain time limit no
leads are found in investigation ?
Q26. How do you monitor corrupt police personnel , who purposefully
fail to investigate case properly , so that either the case can be
closed with “B” report or the prosecution fails to prove the case in
court ?
Q27. Who among police takes the decision to appeal against the verdict
of a lower court , when the prosecution fails ?
Q28. Who took the decision , not to appeal against the argentina court
order acquitting mr.quatrochi accussed in bofors scandal ?
Q29. Do you treat all the prison convicts same in the prison or does
the notorious big time rich criminals get spacious barracks with tv,
news paper , adequate food , medical care , etc while small time
criminals , poor are crammed into pig sty like rooms with 60-70
inmates without any basic requirements ?
Q30. What is the status of my complaint made to the DG & IG of police
, government of Karnataka on 10/12/2004 ? the copies of complaint was
released at press meet at patrakartara bhavan Mysore on same day, even
copies were given to police & intelligence personnel ?
Q31. Why no action , reply regarding the complaint till date ?
Q32. Our constitutional frame workers gave legal immunity privileges
to certain constitutional functionaries , so that they are not
burdened with frivolous court cases & can concentrate on their
constitutional duties. But these privileges doesn’t cover the
individual actions of those public servants like rape , murder , dowry
harassment , tax evasion , misuse of office , etc. but still law
enforcement / police department is bound to send request to home
ministry seeking permission & home ministry sits over files for
months. This gives the accussed ample time to destroy evidences. Is it
right & legal ?
Q33. Does legal immunity privileges cover their official actions alone
? if not what does it cover ?
Q34. What is the time limit for home ministry to give sanction for the
prosecution of tainted constitutional functionaries ?
Q35. How many present MPs , MLAs , MUNICIAPAL CORPORATORS , other
people’s representatives are facing criminal charges ?
Q36. In the past , how many MPs , MLAs , corporators were facing
criminal charges , yearwise since 1987 ? how many of them were
eventually convicted ?
Q37. How many MPs , MLAs , prominent film , sports personalities have
have contacts with underworld , foreign intelligence agencies ?
Q38. How many of them have attended frequent parties hosted by
underworld dons in gulf countries , else where ?
Q39. How many MP , MLA , other people’s representatives are wanted by
police in various cases . but shown in the police records as
absconding but in reality are attending the proceedings of the house
as usual ?
Q40. When did smt. Sonia Gandhi became a citizen of india ? did she
occupy any public office before naturalization ?
Q41. In india , how many MPs , MLAs , MLCs are of foreign origin or
have a spouse of foreign origin ?
Q42. Does smt. Sonia Gandhi have citizenship of any other country ?
Q43. Did she occupy any public office while enjoying dual citizenship ?
Q44. How do you monitor public servants who have spouses of foreign
origin & while they are on foreign tour , from national security
perspective ?
Q45. Is mr. M.S SUBBA member of parliament a citizen of india ?
Q46. What is the status of complaint made by former union minister
mr.subramanya swamy alleging that late P.M rajiv gandhi’s family
received money from foreign intelligence agencies ?
Q47. In many cases like mass riots involving certain political parties
, when that culprit party comes to power all the cases involving it’s
partymen are withdrawn by the government orelse prosecution fails to
prove it’s case & prefers not to appeal. Just remember Bombay riot
case involving shiv sainiks & others , when shiv sena – BJP came to
power in Maharashtra , all the cases against it’s partymen were
withdrawn. Are these type of decisions by government just & legal ?
Q48.what damages has been done to india’s national security due to
mole in the PMO, as alleged by former union minister mr.natwar singh ?
Q49. What action by the government ?
Q50. How many Indians are in the custody of police / military in
various foreign countries ?
Q51. How many foreigners are there in Indian prisons ?
Q52. How GOI is protecting the human rights of these prisoners ?
Q53. Is the government paying any compensation to victims of police
failures , fix-ups , , who suffer in jail for years & acquitted by
courts upon finding them as not guilty ?
Q54. Do you register murder charges / attempt to murder charges
against guilty police officers who are responsible for lock-up deaths
, fake encounters & 3rd degree torture ?
Q55. How many cases has been filed since 1987 till date ?
Q56. What action has been taken against guilty police officers , STF
personnel who were responsible for gross human rights violations ,
3rddegree torture , lock-up deaths of innocents in forest brigand
veerappan’s territory , based on justice A.J.Sadashiva commission
findings ? if not why ?
Q57. I , as a citizen of india as my “fundamental duty” hereby do
offer my conditional services to GOI & GOK to apprehend corrupt public
servants. Are you ready to utilize my services ?
Q58. Police personnel are always in the forefront of containing crimes
, mass fury , riots , etc. they suffer more & even their family
members suffer threats from the criminal elements. Do the government
provide insurance coverage to police & their family members on the
lines of defense forces ?
Q59. What is the amount of coverage to a police constable & his family ?
Q60. Who makes the premium contributions ?
Q61. Do the government provide overtime allowance , food allowance to
police who daily work beyond 8 hours of duty ?
Q62. Is the government giving any training to police personnel in
public interaction , human rights ?
Q63. Is it right to post professionally trained police to sentry ,
orderly duties of ministers ?
Q64. What is the ratio of police personnel to total population in
india since 1987 ?
Q65. IS THE GOVERNMENT GIVING ADEQUATE FOOD, MEDICAL CARE , CLOTHING ,
LIVING SPACE TO PRISON INMATES , AS REQUIRED BY A NORMAL HUMAN EING
ACCORDING TO W.H.O NORMS ?
Q66. Is the forensic science department which conducts narcfo-analysis
, lie-detector test , etc under the control of police department ?
Q67. Is it not right to put it under impartial control of NHRC or like bodies ?
Q68. Is the action of some police officers arranging compromise
meetings & subtly insisting the poor to tow the line of rich or else
face the consequences , is it right & legal ? this happens mostly in
real estate matters.
Q69. Did government make any ransom payments to forest brigand
veerappan during his various kidnappings ?
Q70. What action has been taken based on revealations by karim telgi
during narco analysis about public servants involvement ?
Q71. How many cases of allegations against judges were made in the
media about misuse of office , criminal acts by judges from munsiff
court to supreme court of India ? since 1947 till date
Q72. are the enquiry report findings, action taken reports of such
cases accessible to public ? if not why ?
Q73. what action has been taken against guilty judges ?
Q74. are the guilty judges legally prosecuted in all such cases ? or
has it just ended with their resignation from services or his superior
judge not allotting him any judicial work ?
Q75. why some high ranking judges are not legally prosecuted for their
wrong doings ?
Q76. are judges above law ? are not everybody equal before law ?
Q77. do the judiciary subject , all the cases handled by accussed /
tainted , guilty judges to review , to undo past unjust judgements ?
Q78. how ? if not why ?
Q79. how do the judiciary monitor the net wealth growth of some judges
including the wealth in the name of judge’s family members ?
Q80. do all the judges file their annual income , wealth statements on
sworn affidavits to the higher judiciary ? defaulters how many ?
Q81. how does the judiciary verifies those statements ?
Q82. is such statements made public , on web ?
Q83. when the judgement of a lower court is turned down by the higher
court , what action is initiated against lower court judge for making
unjust judgement & meating out injustice ?
Q84. when allegations of corruption , misuse of office , etc against
judges are made , why the accussed – judges are not subjected to tests
like “poly graph , lie detector , brain mapping , etc” , in the
interest of justice & truth ?
Q85. judges are not employees of government , so they are ineligible
to be the members of “Karnataka state government judicial department
house building co-operative society”. Then how come , many judges
including supreme court judges are admitted as members of this society
& allotted prime residential site worth crores of rupees for a few
thousands by the said society at said society’s – judicial layout ,
yelahanka , Bangalore ? while the ordinary members like peons , clerks
in judicial department are waiting for a site since years , is not the
whole thing grossly illegal ?
Q86. in more than 70% of cases before all courts in India , central
government or state government or government agency is one of the
parties. How many judges or their family members , have received out
of turn , favourable allotments of sites , gas agency , petrol pumps ,
etc by the government ? is not such allotments illegal ? what action ?
Q87. when a person under police custody or judicial custody suffer 3rd
degree torture by police , is not the judge of the respective court
which is handling that tortured person’s case responsible for it ?
Q88. has the higher judiciary legally prosecuted respective judges &
the police officers for committing 3rd degree torture , on charges of
attempt to murder & murder ? if not why ?
Q89. registrar , Mysore district & sessions court , has called for the
candidatures to various vacancies in that court from the public vide
notification no : ADMN/A/10825/2003 dated 19/11/2003. Please furnish
me the merit ranking list of selected candidates along with my merit
ranking for the post of peon.
Q90. registrar , Bangalore city civil court , has called for the
candidatures to various vacancies in that court from the public vide
notification no : ADM-I(A)422/03 dated 19/05/2003. Please furnish me
merit ranking list of selected candidates for the post of peon.
Q91. when a person doesn’t get adequate food , medical care while
under police custody or judicial custody , is not the respective judge
dealing that person’s case responsible for it ? what action ?
Q92. how judiciary is monitoring food & medical care to prisoners ?
Q93. numerous accussed persons are suffering in jail under judicial
custody , for periods far exceeding the legally stipulated sentence
periods. For example : a pick-pocketer is in jail for one year , the
judge finds him guilty of offence & gives him 3 months sentence. What
about the excess punishment of 9 months. Is not the judge responsible
for the illegal , excess punishment of the convict ? what action
against the judge in such cases ?
Q94. numerous innocents suffer in jail for years & finally the judge
finds them as innocents & acquits them of the charges. What about the
prison sentence , the innocent has already served ? is not the judge
responsible for this illegal , unjust punishment to an innocent ?
remedy ? what action against the judge ?
Q95. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions &
the actions arising out of misuse of office ?
Q96. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions
as judges & their personal actions as individuals ?
Q97. are the fundamental rights of citizens supreme or the privileges
of judges , constitutional functionaries supreme ?
Q98. what is the criteria adopted for promotion of judges ?
Q99. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of advocates from
bar , as the judges ?
Q100. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of retired judges ,
as governors of states , members or as chairman of commissions , etc ?
Q101. how many judges belonging to oppressed classes – scheduled caste
, scheduled tribe , other backward classes , minorities & women are
their in supreme court , state high courts & subordinate courts ?
kindly provide specific figures .
Q102. what are the legal measures enforced by judiciary , to enforce
the accountability of judges & to check corruption in judiciary ?
Q103. are not these measures a failure , looking at present state of
affairs of judiciary ?
Q104. does the judges arrange for distribution of alchoholic drinks at
the official meetings , parties , at the tax payer’s expense ?
Q105. does any judges have included their consumption of alchoholic
drinks , in their hotel bill & claimed traveling allowance ?
Q106. what action has been taken against – selectors ie Karnataka high
court judges & newly selected women judges involved in roost resort
scandal in Mysore , Karnataka ?
Q107. when common people / tax payers & even government employees are
not getting proper health care from government at government
hospitals. Is it right & just to provide premium health care to judges
, constitutional functionaries at 5-star private hospitals in India ,
abroad , all at tax payer’s expense ?
Q108. are the judges subjected to periodical health check-ups to
ascertain their health , mental faculties & mental balance in the
midst of all work pressures , emotional tensions ?
Q109. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary for accepting
applications seeking public interest litigations ?
Q110. why numerous appeals for PIL by me , were not considered ?
Q111. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for appointing
“amicus curie” in a case ?
Q112. why my appeal to honourable supreme court , to make me as an
“amicus curie” in late P.M Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination case , was not
considered by the court ?
Q113. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for initiating
suo-motto action ?
Q114. numerous cases of injustices are reported in the media daily ,
with supporting evidences . why not the judiciary take suo-motto
action in all such cases ?
Q115. legal aid boards pre-judge the cases in the name of taking legal
opinion , before providing legal aid to the needy ? is it not needy
person’s rights violation ?
Q116. is not the safety of witnesses , parties in cases responsibility
of the court , both during hearing of the case & afterwards ?
Q117. is the use of 3rd degree torture by police on prisoners , during
the police custody / judicial custody / prison sentence right ? what
action ?
Q118. when the corrupt police officer & government prosecution
advocate together cover-up evidences , conducts improper investigation
intentionally to fail the case – to cover-up rich crooks , high &
mighty people , what action judge takes in such cases ?
Q119. how does the judiciary monitor the wealth growth of police ,
government advoctes , tax officials , officials of licensing
authorities , to ensure proper & fair prosecution of cases against
rich & mighty ?
Q120. what are the status of appeals made by human rights activist
NAGARAJ.M.R. to the honourable supreme court of India ?
Q121. corruption is rampant for selection of officers to
quasi-judicial positions like district / taluk magistrates , tax
officers , revenue officers , land acquisition officers , etc. how the
judiciary monitors over their quasi-judicial actions ?
Q122. subject to conditions , I , NAGARAJ.M.R. , editor , e-voice of
human rights watch , do offer my free services to honourable supreme
court of India , to apprehend corrupt judges , are you – the
honourable court ready to utilize it ?
Q123. what are the status of my appeals , sent to the honourable
supreme court of India , through government of india’s on-line
grievance system ( DPG & DARPG ) :
DPG/M/2006/80008 , DARPG/E/2006/00057, DARPG/E/2006/00225 ,
DPG/M/2006/80021 , DARPG/E/2006/00253 , DPG/M/2006/80032 ,
DARPG/E/2006/01149 , DPG/M/2006/80047 , DARPG/E/2006/01164 ,
DPG/M/2006/80043 , DPG/M/2006/80085 , DARPG/E/2006/06704 ,
DARPG/E/2006/07017 , DARPG/E/2006/07018 , DPG/M/2006/80159 ,
DPG/M/2006/80162 , DARPG/E/2006/07864 , DPG/M/2006/80165 ,
DARPG/E/2006/07877 , DPG/M/2006/80167 , DARPG/E/2006/08028 ,
DARPG/E/2006/08029 , DARPG/E/2006/08032 , DARPG/E/2006/08043 ,
DARPG/E/2006/08044 , DPG/M/2006/80174 , DPG/M/2006/80193 ,
DARPG/E/2007/00044 , DPG/M/2007/80003 , DPG/M/2007/80010 ,
DARPG/E/2007/00164 , DARPG/E/2007/00165 , DPG/M/2007/80014 ,
DPG/M/2007/80025 , DPG/M/2007/80049 , DPG/M/2007/80055 ,
DPG/M/2007/80056 , DPG/M/2007/80078 , DPG/M/2007/80082 ,
DARPG/E/2007/02618
Q124. the appeals made to the honourable supreme court of India ,
copies of which are available at following web pages
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/182 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/206 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/208 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/209 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw
what are the status of those appeals ?
Q125. in the media , we have seen reports about judges committing
crimes – rape , attempt to murder , swindling government money ,
untouchability practice , the disrespect to national flag , sale of
judicial orders , bail , receipt of monetary gains by way of royalty
for books , prime real estate purchase at discounted rate , taking
round about long foreign tours along with family in the name of
official work , etc. by this way , judges themselves are making
contempt of court , constitution of India & citizens of India. How you
are protecting the honour of the judiciary , constitution of India &
citizens of India ? please answer.
Q126. Is the government giving any facilities / affirmative actions to
policemen’s family as being given to defense personnel , ex-servicemen
& their families , like preferential site allotment , lpg agency ,
ration depot , reservation in college admission , soft bank loans ,
etc ?
Q126. if not , why ? after all , the contribution of police to
national security is on par with defense forces.
Q127. is not some high police officials addressing their subordinates
in singular term , abusing them with vulgar words wrong ?
Q128. is not some police personnel calling public with singular term,
abusing public with vulgar words wrong ?
Q129. is it not the duty of prison authorities to protect the health,
lives of prison in-mates ?
Q130.what action is taken against police personnel who wrongly charged
an innocent person of criminal acts , resulting in his confinement in
jail , finally acquitted by court as found to be innocent ?
Q131. is it not right to with hold salary , gratuity , pension to such
guilty police personnel & pay it as compensation to victims of police
failures & atrocities ?
Q132. does our Indian constitution legally permit a citizen of foreign
origin naturalized by marriage to an Indian or naturalized by option ,
to occupy any constitutional office ?
Q133. during british rule in india & various other british colonies ,
criminal cases were foisted against our freedom fighters in India &
other british colonies. After india’s independence what happened to
those cases ? did our Indian government close all such cases or did it
continue with the prosecution ?
Q134. in how many cases GOI & other state government continued with
the prosecution AGAINST OUR FREEDOM FIGHTERS ? why ?
Q135. what about the status of cases against shri.netaji subash Chandra bose ?
Q136. has GOI deported any freedom fighters to Britain or it’s
colonies , to face prosecution after India gained independence ? HAS
GOI RECEIVED ANY REQUEST FROM BRITAIN TO THAT EFFECT ? if yes , why ,
whom ?
Q.137. the honourable supreme court of India failed provide
information to me as per my RTI request appeal no : 91 / 2007 in
response to your letter no : F1 / RTI / A.91 / 2007 dt 13.12.07 , why
?
Q138 . the honourable union home secretary failed to give me
information as per my rti request , he transferred my application to
others , in turn they transferred the application to some others.
Finally , complete truthful information was not given , why ? as the
union home secretary has got copies of all those replies in response
to transferred RTI application , will he send me a consolidated reply
to my present RTI request ?
Q139. in a high profile case before the honourable delhi high court ,
we have seen how defense advocate mr. R.S.ANAND & prosecution advocate
mr. I.U.KHAN made a secret pact to win the case in favour of rich
criminal , totally manipulating prosecution witnesses , evidences &
prosecution stand , totally making mockery of justice system . how you
are ensuring the delivery of justice , there being numerous such
advocates in practice ?
Q140. Smt. Sonia Gandhi is person of foreign origin , she wields
enormous clout more than the Prime Minister himself over the
government of India being the chair person of UPA. Is she legally
permitted to summon confidential official records , minutes of the
cabinet , to hold the cabinet meeting of union ministers ?
Q141. As per law , is she permitted to hold constitutional offices
like prime minister of India or president of India , etc ?
Q.142. What are the fundamental rights of a citizen guaranteed under
the constitution (Article 21) ?

Q143. What are the privileges conferred on legislators &
parliamentarians by the constitution of India?

a) Inside the House b) Outside the House

Q144. What are privileges conferred on constitutional functionaries, like

a) President of India b) Prime Minister of India

c) Chief Justice of India d) Chairman of NHRC

e) Central Vigilance Commissioners.

Q145. Are the privileges legal immunity conferred on above mentioned
constitutional functionaries ?

a) Cover all their official actions irrespective of merit.

b) Cover both their official & personal actions.

Q146. Are the privileges defined & codified ?

Q147. Are these privileges above freedom of the press ?

Q148. Are the liberty & fundamental rights of the citizens guaranteed
by the constitution, above the privileges of the constitutional
functionaries or equal or below ?

Q149. Can the Indian legislatures & parliament be equated to the House
of commons in England which is considered to be a superior court and
court of records ?

Q150. Can the division of powers, namely the legislature, the
executive and the Judiciary, be equated to the functioning of the
House of commons and House of Lords in England ?

Q151. Can a citizen be said to have committed breach of privilege of
the House or court and causing contempt of the house or court by
raising the issues of accountability of constitutional functionaries ?

Q152. Can a Legislature or Parliament enact a new law, to circumvent
or to nullify the Judicial orders with respect to wrongdoings by
peoples representatives & executive ? does not it amount to
infringement of Judicial powers & contempt of the court by the House.

Q153. Are the FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES of a citizen more important than
constitutional duties of a constitutional functionary or equal in
importance to it ?

Q154. Can a constitutional functionary commit crimes, anti-national
activities in the name of constitutional duties, behind the legal veil
of official’s secret act & go unaccountable for his actions and go
unpunished by his legal immunity privileges

Q155. Are the Legislators members of parliament, High court & Supreme
court Judges and other constitutional functionaries not willing to
codify their privileges for the reason that if codified their
privileges would be curtailed and their action would be subjected to
legal scrutiny. ?

Q156. By votes of citizens Legislators and parliamentarians get seats
in the legislature and Parliament out of tax payer’s money, they get
their pay, perks & lead 5-Star luxurious lifestyles. Hence whether a
vote of a citizen is above (More valid) or a seat of legislator or
parliamentarian is above or more valid in a democracy ?

Q157. Judges & Constitutional functionaries are indirectly appointed
by voters / tax payers. Out of tax payers money, they get their pay,
perks & lead 5-star luxurious lifestyles. Hence, whether the vote of a
citizen, fundamental duties of a tax payer is above (more valid) or a
seat of judge / constitutional functionary is above (more
valid) in a democracy ?

Q158. If there is a vacuum in the Legislature or parliament, who is to
fill up that vacuum till such time that the legislature or parliament
acts provide a solution by performing its role by enacting proper
legislation to cover the field (vacuum) ?

Q159. While it is an unhealthy practice for a Judge to claim to be a
Judge in his own cause, is it not worse for the members of the
legislature and parliament to be judges in their own cause ?

Q160. Are the Technicalities of the case more important to a judge or
Justice to a citizen, protection of fundamental rights of citizen.?

Q161. Why not the constitutional functionaries initiate suo moto
action with respect to numerous cases of injustices reported in Media
?

Q162. Why not the Judges admit various cases of Injustices affecting
public, as the Public Interest Litigation” ? In some cases, the Public
or the person representing them is unable to afford the high cost of
the case. Why not free legal aid is given ?.

Q163. What is the criteria for admitting a P.I.L. & giving free legal aid ?

Q164. Communication – free flow of information is the lifeline of a
democracy. Why the constitutional functionaries are not honouring the
Right to Information of Citizens ?
Q165. Recently , while assuming office as honourable chief justice of
Karnataka , justice. P.D.DINAKAR , gave a blanket withdrawal of all
internal departmental enquiries against approximately 200 judges , is
it just & legal ? give me the names of accused judges & description of
charges against them ?
Q166. does it not show that judges are more equal than others ?
Q167. who are involved in PF scam ? what action against guilty judges ?
Q168. Why you did not give information to me as per RTI Act inspite of
appeal ? refer. F1/RTI/A91/2007.
Q169. Almost a year ago , in the Karnataka state new chief justice of
Karnataka high court honble Mr.Dinakar (now elevated to supreme court
of India) just on assuming offices within hours scrapped disciplinary
inquiry proceedings against 200+ erring judges. In such a short time
no human being can study all the cases in detail , then how come he
arrived at this vital decision in such short time? Who are those 200+
judges facing enquiry ?
Q170 .Recently in the Karnataka state , high court found out that a
district judge without conducting hearings properly , entering
fictious dates of hearings (which happens to be government holidays )
facilitated in exonerating a top politician . has the court enquired
into the previous judgements of the accussed judge ? did it find any
wrongdoings?
Q171. As per law , while on duty a person should not be drunk , under
the influence of alchohol , as it limits the functioning of his senses
& brain. That is why the acts & sayings of drunkards , committed /
said when they are drunk are not taken seriously. However most of the
police officers after evening hours are drunk , in that state only
they apprehend many suspects & produce those suspects at the
residences of magistrates before magistrate during wee hours / night.
Some of of the judges are also drunk during that time. Does the senses
of drunken police & judges work properly to do their respective duties
in identifying criminals , apprehending them & to issue judicial
orders. Are these actions of police & judges in drunken state legal ?

Q 172 . What action has been taken in bhopal gas leak case against the
guilty police officials who changed the charge sheet against union
carbide officials ?

Q 173 . What action has been taken against guilty police officials ,
district magistrate , state ministers & central ministers who fully
aided the criminals – Union Carbide official Mr. Anderson to escape
law , to jump bail & flee the country without court’s permission ?

Q 174 . What action has been taken against the above said guilty with
respect to their contempt of court & for aiding a criminal to escape ?

Q 175. What action has been taken against the chief justice of India ,
who changed the legal clause under which the guilty should be tried ?
what action has been taken against the CJI who became an official of
the trust belonging to the criminal ?

Q 176 . What action has been taken against the Indian Public servant
who decided to withdraw cases from US Courts with respect to Bhopal
gas tragedy ?

Q 177 . What action has been taken against the state labour department
& pollution control board officials who have failed in their duties ,
inspite of earlier warnings by journalists ?

Q 178 . What action has been taken against state cabinet ministers who
decided the quantum of compensation money to favour the criminal
although they don’t have right to do so ?

Q 179 . What action has been taken against Presiding Judge of the
trial court , Chief Justice of India , state police officials , public
prosecutors & Central Bureau of Investigation officials who kept quite
all along and didn’t press for the extradition of the criminal
Mr.Anderson , for producing the criminal accussed no.1 before the
trial court ?

Q 180 . Is it not SHAMEFUL for the judiciary , police , government
officials & people’s representatives who became part of Operation
Crime Hush Up & aided criminals responsible for ghastly murders of
thousands & maiming of lakhs of hapless public in Bhopal Gas Leak
Tragedy?

Q 181 . Are these Corrupt Police , corrupt judges , corrupt ministers
, corrupt labour / pollution control board officials HUMAN BEINGS ?
Q 182 Why police are not registering my complaint against CJI & other
VVIPS ,Even after years ?
Q 183 don’t the police of vijayanagar police station mysore have legal
jurisdiction to register the case against these VVIPs ? or just
because the criminals happens to be VVIPs ,they are not booked by
police? If the said police don’t have legal jurisdiction to book these
VVIPs , they should have transferred the complaint to those
authorities who have jurisdiction & authority to book & prosecute
these VVIPs , but not done so , why ?
Q 184 are not all these actions , of VVIPs & police amounting to cover
up of crimes & criminals ? are not these cover ups itself is a crime ?
Q 185. Even an appeal for justice by post card must be treated as PIL
by courts of justice . however my appeals for justice concerning
public welfare , national security sent through post , e-mail to
supreme court of india are not admitted as Public interest litigation
, why ? does not these acts of Supreme court amount to aiding
criminals , anti nationals?
Q 186 Are not the honourable chief justice of india together with the
jurisdictional police & Revenue district magistrate responsible to
protect the fundamental & human rights of people ? why the CJI ,
Mysore DC & Jurisdictional Police have failed to protect the
fundamental & human rights of people including mine ? For all the
previous injustices I have suffered at the hands of the criminal nexus
Honourable CJI , Mysore revenue district magistrate & jurisdictional
police are together responsible , if anything untoward happens to me
or to my family members or to my dependents the quartet – Honourable
Chief Justice of India , Honourable District Magistrate , Mysore ,
Honourable Police Commissioner of Mysore city & Circle Inspector of
police , vijayanagar police station , mysore will be responsible .

These corrupt parasites will feel , understand the pain only when they
also suffer in the same manner. Let us pray to almighty – In whose
Court of justice MATCH FIXING is not there & every body is equal , let
us pray to that god to give these corrupt parasites ghastly deaths
nothing less nothing more.

YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR
1995-2015 .

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER WHO FAILED TO GIVE FULL INFORMATION:

CPIO , SUPREME COURT OF INDIA , NEW DELHI.

FEES PAID : IPO 16G 733465 for rupees TWENTY only

DATE : 28.03.2015 ……………..………………………NAGARAJA.M.R.

PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA….. ……………………….( APPLICANT)

To ,

RTI Appellate Authority ,

O/O Honourable Governor ,

Reserve Bank of India ,

Central Office Building , Shahid Bhagat Singh Marg ,

Mumbai – 400 001

APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA &
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.

ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,

EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,

# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,

HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,

HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN – 570017.

“Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All
Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for
power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed.” Sir Winston made this statement in
the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved
right by some of our criminal , corrupt people’s representatives ,
police , RBI Officials , public servants & Judges. Some of the below
mentioned public servants fall among the category of churchill’s men –
Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters. RBI Officials are denying me
information under one pretext or the other and covering-up SCAM worth
crores of rupees.

We salute honest few in public service , our whole hearted respects to
them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS /
ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS – WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers )
ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT THE
OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND ,
LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE
VIOLATING PEOPLE’S FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE
HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN
APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN
PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD &
CRIMINALS.

HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS /
ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS – WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers )
ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. WITH RESPECT TO CASE NO old CC34 /
1989 & NEW NO SC436/1991 AT 21
ST ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS COURT BANGALORE

CHARGE SHEETED OFFICER MR.G.HARIRAM RBI BANGALORE

CHARGE SHEET NO staff no.3698/156/84-85 dt 01.01.1985

Amended charge sheet staff no.3798/156-84/85 dt 08.04.1985

1. Why didn’t you notice the alleged crimes of 1977 , 78 & 79 till the
mid of 1979 ?

2. This crime came to light only due to anonymous phone calls of good
Samaritans to authorities , but not due to your inspection . is your
inspection division working properly ?

3. why there is no security check up of officers during entry & exit
out of premises ?

4. why there is no individual weighment , individual statement of
value of bags of reissuable notes & bags of note meant for destruction
, after sorting is done, why they are not tallied with total weight ,
value of notes issued for sorting ?

5. Immediately after noticing the crime, why did not you transfer all
the employees of those sections ?

6. why did not you take steps to preserve3 & protect respective
documents relating to such high profile crime ?

7. why didn’t you immediately issue charge sheet to all the accussed &
waited till 1983 ?

8. Why RBI has left out , so many officers ( who worked in the same
sections for more period than accused officers ) from domestic
enquiry ?

9. why CBI also failed to put those people in the charge sheet before
the court ?

10. is it because they were in favorable terms with the vested
interests ?

11. did the CBI dance to the tune of vested interests in RBI while
preparing charge sheet & during investigation , instead of
independent investigation ?

12. those left out probables from the charge sheet might have caused
the destruction of evidences / records. During the course of domestic
enquiry / court proceedings , it has been recorded that some records
have been destroyed. Are not CBI & RBI responsible for destruction of
evidences , aiding true criminals get away ?

13. in normal times , what is the period specified in RBI regulations
for preserving old documents / records ?

14. after noticing such a high profile crime the RBI must have taken
utmost care to preserve such old records for indefinite time , for
producing before courts of law as & when demanded. But it didn’t ,
why ?

15. does not this point to connivance of higher authorities of RBI ,
with the criminals ?

16. RBI authorities have conducted domestic mass enquiries , instead
of individual enquiries , is it not detrimental to the rights of
defense ?

17. RBI authorities have stated that court proceedings & domestic
enquiry are independent of each other & are not binding on one
another. However RBI authorities straight away took on record of
domestic enquiry the court statements , evidences , but didn’t honour
the order of same court of law ? why this double standard by RBI ?

18. The alleged crime was committed in 1977-79, but charge sheet was
framed in mid 1985 , why this long delay ?

19. didn’t this facilitate the masterminds of crime to destroy ,
manipulate evidences ?

20. as stated before court , indeed some records , 22nd currency note
packet were missing , who is responsible for it ?

21. has the CBI conducted enquiry , polygraph test of RBI higher
officers – S.N.RAZDAN , W.S.SARAF , J.P.AWASTHI , J.MITRA & others ,
if not why ?

22. is it not due to inefficiency , negligence of duty by such high
ranking managers , that such a crime occurred in RBI Bangalore ?

23. what disciplinary action RBI has taken against the inefficient ,
negligent higher officials ?

24. whatever internal rules an organization makes must be within the
line of law. If such internal laws of the organization are violative
of law , fundamental rights of employees , such internal rules become
illegal. Are not the way of RBI disciplinary proceedings illegal ?

25. as per RBI pension regulations 1990 , RBI has the right to deduct
any loss caused to the bank , from the pension of RBI employee if the
misconduct of employee is proved in judicial proceedings . even though
mr.G.Hariram came out clean from the court , why RBI has denied his
pension ?

26. judicial courts of law are appellate authorities over & above ,
domestic enquiry committees & judicial orders supersedes the domestic
enquiry proceedings. Still RBI showed contempt of court & didn’t
reinstate mr..G.Hariram into service , why ?

27. even if an employee’s misconduct causing loss to the bank is
proved , before denying him pension (towards making up loss to the
bank) , previous sanction of the central board of RBI must be taken.
But in mr.G.Hariram’s case , pension was denied in full without taking
previous sanction of the central board of RBI , is it not illegal ?

28. RBI alleged that mr..G.Hariram caused loss to the tune of Rs.14000
to the bank & recovered it from his provident fund dues. There was
nothing left over to recover , still RBI completely denied pension to
mr.G.Hariram , why ?

29. ideally, domestic enquiry findings / disciplinary actions should
be completed first , then the employee can appeal to appropriate court
of law. In mr.G.Hariram’s case , CBI & RBI failed to prove the charges
in court of law , as a result court discharged him from the charges.
To cover-up it’s failures RBI management dragged domestic enquiry much
beyond court orders date & gave findings indicting mr..G.Hariram. does
the enquiry officer of domestic enquiry think that he is over & above
the court of law ? is it not illegal & contempt of court ?

30. ideally , RBI authorities should have appealed to higher court
against lower court order discharging mr.G.Hariram from charges. But
it was not done , why ?

31. did the RBI pay interim relief to mr.G.Hariram , during suspension
period ?

32. the undue delay in filing charge sheet , consequent destruction of
key evidences , dishonour / contempt of court orders , undue haste in
giving findings , dismissal , denial of of pension without central
board’s sanction , all point towards criminals within RBI higher
management. What disciplinary action has been taken against
J.P.AWASTHI, S.N.RAZDAN,J.MITRA, W.SARAF & others ? if not why ?

33. why charge sheet was amended? Is it legal ?

34. did the charge sheet was amended to falsely implicate
mr..G.Hariram , by including cancelled note vault in the charge
sheet ?

35. does not this itself show that it is not statement of actual
happenings / facts , but a cunning ploy to mislead investigation
towards fixed innocents from actual criminals ?

36. is it true that that only 5% of sample inspection is done out of
bundled verified defective note packets ?

37. is not the conduct of joint / mass enquiries of all charge sheeted
officers illegal ?

38. how come such an important evidence 22nd note packet went
missing ?

39. is it because it may point towards real criminals ?

40. as per the statement of management witness / inspection head /
expert mr.vijendra rao , the notes of earlier dates have been removed
from packets made into new bundles , right ?

41. as per his statement , entire certificates , seals of some asst
treasurers are there , who didn’t work at all on that day is not it ?

42. does not it show that some body else was misusing the seals ,
putting some innocents seals over the notes ?

43. does it not show that , crime has taken place at verification
section ?

44. does it not show involvement of some asst treasurers ?

45. why asst treasurers have not been charge sheeted ?

46. why inspection of RBI Bangalore office was not done between 1975 &
1979 ?

47. is it not true that you failed to produce all records showing
internal inspection / audits , during domestic enquiry & court
proceedings ?

48. your expert mr.vijendra rao has stated that some seal marks are
smudged , he has stated some seal marks appears to be so & so. He has
clearly nowhere stated that this seal mark is exactly this , so he
himself is not 100% sure ?

49. your expert nowhere said that 100% sure this seal mark is this ,
on that day this seal was issued to mr.G.Hariram , isn’t it ?

50. your expert says during 1975 , he didn’t notice3 any fraud.
However approver says fraud was there before mid 1977 also. Why no
action has been taken ?

51. why you didn’t produce all records of all persons , who have
specifically worked in alleged sections , the registers of those
departments with daily activity report containing seal nos , packet
nos , bag nos , etc ?

52. are not their chances of some criminals putting the seal marks of
innocent officers over the notes , bundles , bags , etc ?

53. your expert is not 100% sure of seal mark , your records are not
there to prove the presence of charge sheeted officers in the alleged
sections , neither your expert nor your records are 100% sure on what
date , at what stage , by whom crime was committed , isn’t it ?

54. is not the charge sheet amounting to higher ups picking up
officers they dislike & falsely implicating them ?

55. is it not cunning ploy of higher ups to divert attention from
original criminals ?

56. why no action was taken against currency officer of 1977-79
mr.J.Mitra ? why his pension , super annuation benefits were not
withheld ?

57. what is your justification , supporting evidence , records for
picking up only three officers including mr.G.Hariram for legal
prosecution and leaving the majority of probables ?

58. why you have dropped charges against five asst treasurers ? why
you didn’t even conduct domestic enquiry against them , let alone
legal prosecution ?

59. Is it RBI’s & CBI’s way of fair play & justice ?

60. as inly 5% sampling of verified note bundles are done , there are
more possibilities of rebundled packets getting unnoticed in relaxed
95% lot , isn’t it ?

61. you have left out so many officers who worked in those sections,
some of whom even became management witnesses , instead of being
charge sheeted by the management, is it fair play & legal ?

62. who are the bank employees , from whom you have recovered the
alleged bank loss of Rs.220000 ?

63. were all of them charge sheeted , enquired , legally prosecuted ,
dismissed & their pension , gratuity withheld ?

64. you don’t have any internal statuotary records to prove that
mr.G.Hariram worked in those departments , except a currency officer’s
office note dated just on the eve of charge sheet years after the
alleged crime ? does it not prove that this note has been concocted
just to fix mr.G.Hariram ?

65. where as you have records of other officials attendance in those
departments , but not charge sheeted them why ?

66. three officers of staff grade A daily work in three sections out
of 40 officers , why you have picked up only mr.G.Hariram , out of
1095 working days , he has worked for only 223 days in those
sections , still those officers who worked for more days in those
sections are not charge sheeted why ? the approver , the management
expert witness , shift registers , V2 registers , Destruction
certificates , Form CD 55 , etc , nobody , no records were able to say
on what date , at what stage , by whom crime took place , also they
were unable to say on what date at what stage crime was committed by
mr.G.Hariram ? is it not futile imagination , cunning ploy of RBI
higher authorities to fix innocent Mr.G.Hariram ?

67. the management expert witnesses said , the most probable place of
crime is punching / Cancelled Note Vault , incinerator , where asst
treasurers were joint custodians . they were not enquired & let off
why ?

68. the charge sheet alleges extraction / substitution of
defaced note packets. Where as the management expert witness say
substitution of defaced notes only ? is not there difference between
loss of one number of note & 100 number of notes ?

69. as per the normal course of duty , staff officers does not
count notes in each bundles , but they just count the number of
bundles only. Is not there chances of inserted note bundles or bundles
containing less number of notes going unnoticed ? is it not the
failure of statuotary system of work practices ?

70. does not all these prove higher authorities of RBI & CBI
were hell bent to fix mr.G.Hariram & to shield the original
criminals ?

Questions with respect to other cases :

71. how do you monitor the work of bank officials nominated as
directors of companies which have availed bank loans ?

72. how do you monitor the work of companies , in which banks
have invested ?

73. how do you monitor the rapid wealth growth of certain bank
officials , who work in shares investment / equity funds section ,
etc ?

74. inspite of project reports by bank officials , over
assessment of collateral securites / value of debtor companies by bank
officials , the loans become NPAs & full value cann’t be realized in
the market by selling off the assets of debtor companies also. In such
cases , what action is taken against erring bank officials who collude
with criminal industrialists for availing higher amount of loan than
permissible ?

75. give bankwise specific figures of NPAs.

76. give names of industrial groups / promoters whose
companies have become NPAs , so that public can be aware of them ,
before investing in new companies promoted by them.

77. is not collection of loan from debtors of bank through
rowdies / recovery agents , illegal ?

78. why not criminal complaints filed against bank mangers for
aiding , abetting rowdism , murdering people ?

79. if your method of employing rowdies to collect loans of Rs.
10000 from commoners is right , what would you do to a promoter of a
debtor company to recover loans of crores of rupees , supari killing ?
but debtors of crores of rupees is let off coolly by banks , why ?

80. what is the exact amount of loss caused to the exchequer
by karim lala telgi who printed fake stamp papers ?

81. what action has been taken against those involved ?

82. have you taken action against all those mentioned by telgi
during narco analysis test , if not why ? is it because they are
powerful & bigwigs ?

83. how you are controlling the illegal finance activities ,
money lending by individuals , pawn brokers & chit fund companies ?

84. how you are monitoring the receipt of public donations ,
foreign donations by many NGOs ?

85. how many erring NGOs , chit fund companies , pawn
brokers , individuals you have booked for illegal finance activities ?

Questions relating to RBI CURRENCY NOTE PRESS MYSORE

86. who were responsible for selling the good printing machine at
security press nasik to scamster karim lala telgi as scrap ?

87. who recruited the candidates below merit rankings in R.B.I for
what criminal roles ?

88. how many irregularities have taken place in R.B.I till date ?

89. who is responsible for installing, operating & supervising the
security set-up in R.B.I ?

90. how the raw materials ie number of paper sheets, ink, etc are
accounted for in inward stores & while issuing for printing ?

91. how wastages, scrap of ink , papers , etc in the printing process
are accounted for?

92. How the finished goods ie currency notes are accounted for ?

93. Who keeps physical figures & possession of goods, inventory of
all the above?

94. How the scrap paper is disposed off ?

95. From security angle who keeps track from start till dispatch ?

96. Give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the
post of stores assistant in BRBNMPL in the year 1995-96 ?

97. give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the
post of process assistant at BRBNMPL in the year 1996 ?

98. give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the
post of process assistants & maintenance assistants at BRBNMPL in the
year 1996-1998 ?

99. is not RBI & BRBNMPL authorities created by statuotary
laws , fully funded by public money ie from government exchequer ?

100. still why BRBNMPL & RBI refused to answer my previous
information request as per RTI Act ? are you afraid that skeletons
will come out of cubboard ?

101. what action initiated against the SBI branch Bangalore & SBI
Overseas branch for loss of cheque / draft amounting to crores of
rupees ? if not why ?

102. give me specific figures bank wise with respect to loss caused
to the bank by loss of cheques or demand drafts , etc ?

103. how RBI is containing crimes of loss of cheques / DDs causing
huge losses to the banks to the tune of crores of rupees ?

104. what action taken against the RBI officials who are covering up
crimes inspite of my repeated appeals & RTI requests ?

YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR
1995 – 2015 .

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER WHO FAILED TO GIVE INFORMATION :

CPIO , C/o PCGM and Secretary , Secretary’s Department , Reserve Bank
of India , 16 th floor, Central Office Building , Shahid Bhagat Singh
Marg , Mumbai – 400 001

FEES PAID : IPO 16G 733466 for rupees TWENTY only

DATE : 28.03.2015 ……………..………………………NAGARAJA.M.R.

PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA….. ……………………….( APPLICANT)

To,

Shri. Dr.Sindhe Bhimsen Rao . H ,

RTI APPELLATE AUTHORITY & CPIO ,

Additional Secretary to Chief Minister ,

Room No 236 , 2nd Floor ,

Vidhana Soudha , Bangalore – 560001.

APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA &
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.

ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,

EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,

# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,

HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,

HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN – 570017.

Please go through the some of actual criminal cases of land grabbings
enclosed herewith.

“Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All
Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for
power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed.” Sir Winston made this statement in
the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved
right by some of our criminal , corrupt people’s representatives ,
police , public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned
officials fall among the category of churchill’s men – Rogues ,
Rascals & Freebooters. To my previous RTI requests & appeals they
tried covering – up crores worth SCAM by transferring application from
one to the other at the end by denying information to me, Does not the
Revenue department possess information ?

We salute honest few in public service , our whole hearted respects to
them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS /
ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS – WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers )
ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT THE
OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND ,
LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE
VIOLATING PEOPLE’S FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE
HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN
APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN
PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD &
CRIMINALS. I HAVE SHOWN IN DETAIL WITH LIVE , ACTUAL CASES , EXAMPLES
, HOW INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM IS MANIPULATED BY CRIMINALS WITHIN JUDICIARY
, POLICE , PROSECUTION , ETC. READ DETAILS AT :

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,

Main A :

1. The land encroachments & illegal buildings and it’s continued
existence since years is not possible without tacit , covert support
of jurisdictional revenue officials. What disciplinary action has been
taken against concerned officials with respect to each case of land
encroachment & illegal buildings , case wise ?

2. If not , why ?

3. Is not “land AKRAMA SAKRAMA SCHEME” itself illegal ?

4. Is not the move of government of Karnataka to legalise land
encroachments & illegal buildings , in itself illegal ?

5. Till date in some cases of land encroachers are evicted & some
buildings violating building byelaws demolished , you could have
spared them to enjoy the benefit of land akrama sakrama scheme. Why
you didn’t spare them ?

6. Is this scheme applicable for only chosen few ?

7. Does this scheme also benefit rich people above BPL ?

8. Does this scheme also benefit big land developers , land developing
companies ?

9. To my previous RTI appeals to MUDA , BDA only partial information
was given , conveniently hiding the truth. Is it not violation of RTI
act ?

10. Does not hiding information about land crimes , in itself also a crime ?

11. I have shown in detail some land crimes in Karnataka. What action
by government of Karnataka , casewise ?

12. https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams
,

13. https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,

14. Does not hiding a land crime , embolden land grabber to commit
more land crimes ?

15. What action taken against BDA , MUDA & Revenue department
officials who are covering crores worth land scams inspite of my
repeated appeals & RTI Requests ?

Main B : RTI QUESTIONS Mysore DC , COMMISSIONER OF MUDA ( MYSORE URBAN
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ) & COMMISSIONER OF MCC ( MYSORE CITY
CORPORATION ) ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER

1. how many times since 1987 , MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has revised /
modified the mysore city’s comprehensive city development plan ?

2. how many cases of CDP violations were registered by MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ?

3. how many cases of CDP violations were legalized in the CDP revision
/ modification by the authorities ?

4. when an application for alienation of land is made to you , say
from civic amenity site to commercial , what norms are followed by
MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ?

5. how do you provide alternate civic amenity site in the locality ,
if the area is already full ? do you deprive people of civic amenities
?

6. during such alenation , is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT collecting
market rate difference between civic amenity site & commercial site ?
if not why ?

7. in mysore city , many building complexes , buildings have been
built fully violating building bye-laws – no set off , no parking
space , no emergency fire exit , no earthquake tolerant . what action
by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ?

8. how many cases of building bye-laws violations has been registered
by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987 ? what is the action status
report yearwise ?

9. how much of MUDA’s / MCC’s / GOVERNMENT’s lands , sites , buildings
& houses have been illegally occupied by criminal tresspassers since
1987 ?

10. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT registered criminal cases against
each such illegal occupation ? if not why ? provide status report
yearwise ?

11. in how many cases of such illegal occupation MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT has legalized , regularized such illegal occupation just
through MUDA’s / MCC’s resolution instead of of reallotting the same
through public notification to the next senior most in the waiting
list , after giving notice of allotment cancellation to original
allottee ? if not done so why ?

12. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT followed all legal norms in
reallotment of lands , sites , houses , etc to the illegal occupiers ?
what is the procedure followed ?

13. in mysore city , numerous housing societies & real estate
Developers have mushroomed , Land allotments of how many housing
societies , real estate firms among them are legally authorized by
MUDA , MCC , GOVERNMENT & how many not ? since 1987 till date ?

14. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT filed criminal complaints against
such illegal housing societies & illegal real estate firms ? if not
why ?

15. what action MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has initiated against real
estate firms & housing societies who have violated MUDA norms , layout
plans , etc ? if not why ?

16. the government has framed building bye-laws like width of road ,
space for civic amenities , parking space , emergency fire exit , etc
keeping high in the mind safety of people first. MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT is in the practice of levying a pittance as penalty on the
building byelaw violators , layout Development plan violators &
legalizing those
violations. Safety of public & amenities of public are totally
neglected by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT . When public people die , suffer
injuries / accidents – say during a fire tragedy in a complex due to
lack of fire exit , when people park vehicles on pavement in front of
a business complex as the complex doesn’t have a parking space of it’s
own , the pedestrians going that way are forced to come down on road
resulting in accidents , injuries & deaths . is not the MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT responsible for those accidents , injuries & deaths ?

17. what is the criteria adopted by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT for out of
Turn allotment of Lands , sites , houses to renowned sports persons ,
judges , journalists , politicians , artists , etc ?

18. how many judges , artists , politicians , journalists , sports
persons , etc have benefited from these out of turn allotments by MUDA
/ MCC / GOVERNMENT ? specific figures yearwise since 1987 ?

19. what action has been taken against developers , housing societies
, who have violated MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT norms ?

20. when poor scheduled caste , scheduled tribe people , minority
people illegally live On MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT sites building
temporary huts , MUDA / AUTHORITIES with the help of police razes down
those huts & evicts the poor by brute force. Whereas , when cronies of
political bigwigs illegally occupy MUDA , MCC / GOVERNMENT lands worth
crores of rupees & build big complexes earning thousands of rupees
monthly rent , MUDA or authorities not even files police complaint
against them instead regularizes the illegal occupation by levying a
pittance as fine. Why this double standard by MUDA / MCC GOVERNMENT ?

21. HOW MANY CASES OF ILLEGAL OCCUPATIONS are regularized by MUDA /
MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ? yearwise figures ?

22. how much of MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , houses are
under illegal occupation ? status report yearwise since 1987 ?

23. how much of those has been recovered ? has the MUDA ,AUTHORITIES
recovered the rents earned by illegal occupation ?

24. have you filed police complaints against those criminals –
tresspassers ? if not why ?

25. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT giving wide publicity & sufficient
time to bidders about it’s auction schedules ?

26. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT giving market value to land loosers ?

27. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT exactly using the acquired lands ,
for the same purpose mentioned in the project plan ?

28. is the MUDA / AUTHORITIES acquiring lands at lower rates from
farmers & selling it at a premium , by way making profits just like a
real estate agency ?

29. in villages , there are cattle grazing grounds meant for the usage
of whole villagers, forest for the usage of whole village , lands
belonging to village temples. Some villagers have donated their
personal lands to village temples , cattle grazing for the benefit of
whole villagers. All the villagers are stake holders , owners of such
lands. When MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT acquires such lands to whom does it pay compensation ? what
about welfare objectives of those lands ?

30. till date , how many lakes , ponds , how many feeder canals have
been closed , filled with mud , developed , sold as sites , etc by
MUDA MCC or other land developers ?

31. has the MUDA , MCC taken alternate steps to create new lakes ,
ponds ? how many are created till date ?

32. in & around mysore city , high tension electric lines are there in
busy residential areas . as per Indian electricity act , no permanent
structures should be under the HT lines. However there are buildings
under it. In some places , HT lines runs in the middle of the road.
The authorities Have developed those areas beneath HT lines as parks ,
rented out
advertisement spaces & built permanent fencing of those areas spending
lakhs of taxpayer’s money. This fencing obstructs the movement of
service personnel of electricity board , to service HT line. Are all
these structures under
& surrounding HT lines legal ?

33. till date how many burial grounds are acquired & sold as sites by
MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT or other developers ? specific figures
yearwise since 1987 castewise , religionwise ?

34. in & around mysore city , in how many areas developed by MUDA &
private developers , the sewage water generated in those areas is
directly let into lake , ponds ?

35. how many tributaries , lakes , ponds are killed in this fashion by
MUDA , MCC & other developers , housing societies ?

36. how many business complexes , flats , residential layouts
developed by private real estate developers , housing societies are
dumping the sewage , / waste generated in their buildings , into
unauthorized dumping grounds , lakes , etc . thus disturbing the
environment & creating public health hazard ? how the MUDA / MCC is
monitoring sewage / waste disposal ? status report yearwise since 1987
till date .

37. how many unauthorized housing layouts are there in & around mysore
city ? what action by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT against them ? action
taken report yearwise since 1987 till date .

38. around mysore city , vast areas of village farm lands ,
agricultural lands are acquired by private real estate developers for
non agricultural purposes by a single firm or single owner. Are these
actions legal ? some of these real estate agents have sold those lands
to private industries , multinational companies for crores of rupees.
Has the MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT given alienation of land ie conversion from agricultural to
industrial usage. Has KIADB given consent to it ?

39. can a single individual / firm can purchase such vast tracts of
agricultural lands , is it legal ? is it within the KIADB’s
comprehensive industrial area development plan ?

40. has the MUDA / MCC , KIADB given wide publicity , public notice
calling for objections before alienation of such lands ?

41. are all those alienations , strictly in conformance to MUDA’s /
MCC’s CDP & KIADB’s industrial area development plan ? violations how
many ?

42. is the MUDA & KIADB revising / modifying CDP & INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT PLAN , to suit those real estate developers & Private
companies ? on what legal grounds ?

43.what action has been taken based on mysore district magistrate
mr.T.M.Vijaya Bhaskar’s report on land grabbings in mysore ?

44.in mysore city , hebbal-hootagalli industrial area , a lake has
been destroyed while building kaynes hotel , hinkal lake is shrinking
, lake in front of BEML Quarters has been alloted to M/S THRILLER
CLOTHING CO, are all these actions legal & in conformance to MUDA’s
CDP ? if not why ? what action ?

45. while auctioning off the lands of sick industrial unit M/S IDEAL
JAWA LTD , was there any pre-qualification to bidders that after
purchase of lands only it must be used for industrial use or only
industries can participate in the bidding process ?

46.why not it has been clearly mentioned in the tender document that ,
said land is open for alienation ?

47. about this issue , our publication has even raised it’s objections
, in it’s newspaper . no action , why ? as a result , the government ,
banks , employees were cheated off their dues & the private firm made
huge profits. is this auction & alienation legal ?

48.numerous NGO’s , trusts promoted by religious bodies , mutts are
allotted prime lands at preferrential rates , for the reason that they
will use it for public / social welfare. however many of the trusts
are using the whole or part of the land for commercial purposes other
than the stated public / social welfare purpose. what action has been
taken by MUDA , MCC or government in such cases ?

49.how many trusts have violated government norms in this way since
1987 till date? what action taken by MUDA , MCC & government action
taken report yearwise since 1987 till date ?

50.how many such illegalities / violations by trusts are regularized
by MUDA , MCC or authorities , on what legal grounds ? ATR since 1987
till date ?

51.before regularizing such violations have you sought public
objections & given media publicity ? if not why ?

52.how you are monitoring the net wealth growth of some MUDA / MCC /
REVENUE officials & their family members , who have land acquisition /
denotifying , land usage conversion authorities ?

53.how many trusts , NGOs are allotted prime residential / commercial
lands by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT on lease basis , in turn the said
trusts , NGOs have sulet it either partly or wholly to others ?

54.how many such lease allotments are sold by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT
before the expiry of lease period , without public auction ?

55. what are the norms followed by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT for the
sale of leased lands to the lessee before the expiry of lease period ?

Main C : RTI – QUESTIONS COMMISSIONER OF BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY ( BDA ) , COMMISSIONER , BRIHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE
( BBMP ) & CHAIRMAN , KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD (
KIADB) ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER

1. how many times since 1987 , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has
revised / modified the Bangalore city’s comprehensive city development
plan ?

2. how many cases of CDP violations were registered by BDA / BBMNP /
KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ?

3. how many cases of CDP violations were legalized in the CDP revision
/ modification by the authorities ?

4. when an application for alienation of land is made to you , say
from civic amenity site to commercial , what norms are followed by BDA
/ BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?

5. how do you provide alternate civic amenity site in the locality ,
if the area is already full ? do you deprive people of civic amenities
?

6. during such alenation , is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT
collecting market rate difference between civic amenity site &
commercial site ? if not why ?

7. in bangalore city , many building complexes , buildings have been
built fully violating building bye-laws – no set off , no parking
space , no emergency fire exit , no earthquake tolerant . what action
by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?

8. how many cases of building bye-laws violations has been registered
by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 ? what is the action
status report yearwise ?

9. how much of BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands , sites ,
buildings & houses have been illegally occupied by criminal
tresspassers since 1987 ?

10. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT registered criminal cases
against each such illegal occupation ? if not why ? provide status
report yearwise ?

11. in how many cases of such illegal occupation BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT has legalized , regularized such illegal occupation just
through BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT ` s resolution instead of of
re-allotting the same through public notification to the next senior
most in the waiting list , after giving notice of allotment
cancellation to original allottee ? if not done so why ?

12. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT followed all legal norms
in reallotment of lands , sites , houses , etc to the illegal
occupiers ? what is the procedure followed ?

13. in bangalore city , numerous housing societies & real estate
Developers have mushroomed , Land allotments of how many housing
societies , real estate firms among them are legally authorized by BDA
/ BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT & how many not ? since 1987 till date ?

14. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT filed criminal complaints
against such illegal housing societies & illegal real estate firms ?
if not why ?

15. what action BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has initiated against
real estate firms & housing societies who have violated BDA / BBMNP /
KIADB / GOVERNMENT norms , layout plans , etc ? if not why ?

16. the government has framed building bye-laws like width of road ,
space for civic amenities , parking space , emergency fire exit , etc
keeping high in the mind safety of people first. BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT is in the practice of levying a pittance as penalty on the
building byelaw violators , layout Development plan violators &
legalizing those violations. Safety of public & amenities of public
are totally neglected by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT. When public
people die , suffer injuries / accidents – say during a fire tragedy
in a complex due to lack of fire exit , when people park vehicles on
pavement in front of a business complex as the complex doesn’t have a
parking space of it’s own , the pedestrians going that way are forced
to come down on road resulting in accidents , injuries & deaths . is
not the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT responsible for those
accidents , injuries & deaths ?

17. what is the criteria adopted by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT
for out of Turn allotment of Lands , sites , houses to renowned sports
persons , judges , journalists , politicians , artists , etc ?

18. how many judges , artists , politicians , journalists , sports
persons , etc have benefited from these out of turn allotments by BDA
/ BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT? specific figures yearwise since 1987 ?

19. what action has been taken against developers , housing societies
, who have violated BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT norms ?

20. when poor scheduled caste , scheduled tribe people , minority
people illegally live On BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT sites
building temporary huts , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT with the
help of police razes down those huts & evicts the poor by brute force.
Whereas , when cronies of political bigwigs illegally occupy BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands worth crores of rupees & build big
complexes earning thousands of rupees monthly rent , BDA / BBMNP /
KIADB / GOVERNMENT or authorities not even files police complaint
against them instead regularizes the illegal occupation by levying a
pittance as fine. Why this double standard by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT?

21. HOW MANY CASES OF ILLEGAL OCCUPATIONS are regularized by BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ? yearwise figures ?

22. how much of BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands , sites ,
houses are under illegal occupation ? status report yearwise since
1987 ?

23. how much of those has been recovered ? has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB
/ GOVERNMENT arecovered the rents earned by illegal occupation ?

24. have you filed police complaints against those criminals –
tresspassers ? if not why ?

25. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT giving wide publicity &
sufficient time to bidders about it’s auction schedules ?

26. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT giving market value to
land loosers ?

27. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT exactly using the acquired
lands , for the same purpose mentioned in the project plan ?

28. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT acquiring lands at lower
rates from farmers & selling it at a premium , by way making profits
just like a real estate agency ?

29. in villages , there are cattle grazing grounds meant for the usage
of whole villagers, forest for the usage of whole village , lands
belonging to village temples. Some villagers have donated their
personal lands to village temples , cattle grazing for the benefit of
whole villagers. All the villagers are stake holders , owners of such
lands. When BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT acquires such lands to
whom does it pay compensation ? what about welfare objectives of those
lands ?

30. till date , how many lakes , ponds , how many feeder canals have
been closed , filled with mud , developed , sold as sites , etc by BDA
/ BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or other land developers ?

31. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT taken alternate steps to
create new lakes , ponds ? how many are created till date ?

32. in & around bangalore city , high tension electric lines are there
in busy residential areas . as per Indian electricity act , no
permanent structures should be under the HT lines. However there are
buildings under it. In some places , HT lines runs in the middle of
the road. The authorities Have developed those areas beneath HT lines
as parks , rented out advertisement spaces & built permanent fencing
of those areas spending lakhs of taxpayer’s money. This fencing
obstructs the movement of service personnel of electricity board , to
service HT line. Are all these structures under & surrounding HT lines
legal ?

33. till date how many burial grounds are acquired & sold as sites by
BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or other developers ? specific
figures yearwise since 1987 castewise , religionwise ?

34. in & around bangalore city , in how many areas developed by BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT & private developers , the sewage water
generated in those areas is directly let into lake , ponds ?

35. how many tributaries , lakes , ponds are killed in this fashion by
BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT & other developers , housing
societies ?

36. how many business complexes , flats , residential layouts
developed by private real estate developers , housing societies are
dumping the sewage , / waste generated in their buildings , into
unauthorized dumping grounds , lakes , etc . thus disturbing the
environment & creating public health hazard ? how the BDA / BBMNP /
KIADB / GOVERNMENT is monitoring sewage / waste disposal ? status
report yearwise since 1987 till date .

37. how many unauthorized housing layouts are there in & around
bangalore city ? what action by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT
against them ? action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date .

38. around bangalore city , vast areas of village farm lands ,
agricultural lands are acquired by private real estate developers for
non agricultural purposes by a single firm or single owner. Are these
actions legal ? some of these real estate agents have sold those lands
to private industries , multinational companies for crores of rupees.
Has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT given alienation of land ie
conversion from agricultural to industrial usage. Has KIADB given
consent to it ?

39. can a single individual / firm can purchase such vast tracts of
agricultural lands , is it legal ? is it within the KIADB’s
comprehensive industrial area development plan ?

40. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT given wide publicity ,
public notice calling for objections before alienation of such lands ?

41. are all those alienations , strictly in conformance to BDA / BBMNP
/ KIADB / GOVERNMENT’s industrial area development plan ? violations
how many ?

42. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT revising / modifying CDP &
INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN , to suit those real estate
developers & Private companies ? on what legal grounds ?

43.what action has been taken based on mysore district magistrate
mr.T.M.Vijaya Bhaskar’s report on land grabbings in mysore ?

44.in mysore city , hebbal-hootagalli industrial area , a lake has
been destroyed while building kaynes hotel , hinkal lake is shrinking
, lake in front of BEML Quarters has been alloted to M/S THRILLER
CLOTHING CO, are all these actions legal & in conformance to MUDA’s
CDP ? if not why ? what action ?

45. while auctioning off the lands of sick industrial unit M/S IDEAL
JAWA LTD , was there any pre-qualification to bidders that after
purchase of lands only it must be used for industrial use or only
industries can participate in the bidding process ?

46.why not it has been clearly mentioned in the tender document that ,
said land is open for alienation ?

47. about this issue , our publication has even raised it’s objections
, in it’s newspaper . no action , why ? as a result , the government ,
banks , employees were cheated off their dues & the private firm made
huge profits. is this auction & alienation legal ?

48.numerous NGO’s , trusts promoted by religious bodies , mutts are
allotted prime lands at preferrential rates , for the reason that they
will use it for public / social welfare. however many of the trusts
are using the whole or part of the land for commercial purposes other
than the stated public / social welfare purpose. what action has been
taken by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT in such cases ?

49.how many trusts have violated government norms in this way since
1987 till date? what action taken by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT
action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date ?

50.how many such illegalities / violations by trusts are regularized
by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT, on what legal grounds ? ATR since
1987 till date ?

51.before regularizing such violations have you sought public
objections & given media publicity ? if not why ?

52.how you are monitoring the net wealth growth of some BDA / BBMNP /
KIADB / GOVERNMENT officials & their family members , who have land
acquisition / denotifying , land usage conversion authorities ?

53.how many trusts , NGOs are allotted prime residential / commercial
lands by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT on lease basis , in turn the
said trusts , NGOs have sulet it either partly or wholly to others ?

54.how many such lease allotments are sold by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT before the expiry of lease period , without public auction
?

55. what are the norms followed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT
for the sale of leased lands to the lessee before the expiry of lease
period ?

56. what is the status of house allotted to sri.chandrashekariah vide
BDA allotment letter no: 310/267/BDA/ADM/KMRSL(H)/78-79 dt 11/08/1978.

57. why BDA didn’t file police complaint to evict encroachers?

58. why BDA didn’t inform the descendents of original allottee about
the cancellation of their allotment ?

59.what happened to the money deposited by original allottee?

60.is the action of BDA allotting the said house to an illegal
encroacher just by the resolution of BDA committee legal ?

61. in case the BDA wished to re-allot the said house , first it must
have informed the original allottee about cancellation of allotment
allowing them sufficient time to reply with public notice in news
papers , then they should have allotted the said house to the senior
most in the waiting list. But BDA has just allotted the house to an
illegal encroacher by the resolution of BDA committee. Is it legal ?

62. BDA officials gave half truths to my RTI request & stated that the
said file concerning this issue cann’t be found ie lost . is it legal
?

63. has the BDA filed police complaint regarding theft of file from
the record room ? HONOURABLE COMMISSIONER OF BDA PLEASE REFER THE
FOLLOWING ARTICLE.

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,

YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR 1995 – 2015 .

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER WHO FAILED TO GIVE INFORMATION :

PIO , CHIEF MINSTER’S OFFICE , GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA , VIDHANA
SOUDHA , BANGALORE.

FEES PAID : IPO 16G 733464 for Rupees TWENTY only

DATE : 28.03.2015 ……………..………………………NAGARAJA.M.R.

PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA….. ……………………….( APPLICANT)

Right to Information as a Human Right and Developments in India

Presentation at Sarai by Debashish Sankhari, Commonwealth Human Rights
Initiative.

Case 1: Alice lives in the tribal district of Chaibasa in Jharkhand –
her husband wandered into the forest

and was trampled by a wild elephant. As per the law she is entitled to
claim compensation from the forest

authorities when she produces a copy of the FIR and the post mortem
report. The police officer at her local

police station refuses to give her these copies.

Case 2: A familiar story of the Bhopal gas leak tragedy – people were
not aware of the details of the gas that

had leaked. Once established that it was Methyl-iso-cynate – when
Union Carbide was asked for the

antidote to the gas – they said that it was a protected trade secret,
hence could not be divulged.

Case 3: Enron – People were not given a fair chance to make
representations expressing any reservations or

opposition to the Dhabol Power project. The representations can be
made only after salient features of the

project are provided like the cost of the electricity generated, the
basis for this calculations, total expenditure,

area affected, etc. The company did not provide these details at all
in the public notification and nobody could

make any meaningful representation that could be sent to the approving
authority (the Central Electricity

Authority).

There is one common thread that runs through the above mentioned cases
– and that is a

lack of access to Information. Restrictions on the free flow of
information – especially

between government and citizen – has resulted not only in eroding the
democratic principles

enshrined in the Indian Constitution but has resulted in the failure
of government policies

and development schemes for bettering the lot of the poor. Denial of
information has

perpetuated the political, social and economic exclusion of millions;
aided in the illegitimate

retention and abuse of power by select segments of society;
facilitated widespread corruption

and impeded the fight against poverty eradication. With the lack of
access to information,

people are unaware of the developments schemes and are completely
unequipped to engage

in informed participation in their own development even if given a
chance. Therefore,

decades of development have been lost through decision making
uninformed by the realities

of those without a veritable voice.

The concept of human development is directly linked to human rights. A
rights-based

approach demands participation in governance and development, which
guaranteed access

to information can provide.

Needless to say when Alice is not granted a copy of the FIR and post
mortem report, she

was being denied access to compensation that was rightfully hers. Due
to the lack of

information about the effects of the deadly gas and its antidote, the
right to life of the people

itself was denied. The people of Maharashtra had no option to realise
their voices against

Enron. They were not only being denied the right to participate in
their governance, and

they were kept in the dark all the while electricity was being
generated at a much higher than

normal rate charged by the other companies and the bill was being
footed by a public body.

Page 2

The right to information is a basic right that underpins good
governance, democracy,

poverty eradication and the practical realisation of human rights.
Good governance is not

achieved simply by having efficient government or even a democratically elected

government. The norms of freedom of information and the assurance of
widespread citizen

participation in public affairs and an active civil society are
essential for the full realisation of

democracy – a system of government responsive to the needs of its
citizens – and to develop

a culture of human rights and accountability. The recognition of right
to information is

crucial to achieving these ends hence the need for a guaranteed and
legislated right to

information.

World over legislation on access to information are knows as ‘Freedom
of Information laws’.

In India advocates for the issue insist on using the ‘Rights’ language
and calling the

legislation the ‘Right to Information Law’. This distinction may
appear to some as playing

with semantics. However, there is a very important distinction that
should not be ignored. It

must be kept in mind that ‘Rights’ in general imply corresponding
duties. In the context of

the right to information the citizen’s right to information casts a
duty on the government to

ensure that information sought is provided. On the other hand,
‘freedom’ does not convey a

strong and clear sense of duty on the government to provide
information to the public, as

the public, in this case, does not hold a ‘right’ to information.

Constitutional position

While some countries recognise Right to Information explicitly in
their Constitutions

1

, in

others the judiciary has interpreted the Right to freedom of speech
and expression to include

the Right to Information. The Right to Information has not explicitly
been recognised in the

Indian constitution. However, the Supreme Court of India has
interpreted through various

decisions that the right to information is a part of the Right to
Freedom of Speech and

Expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution. In
addition, the Supreme Court

of India has gone on to say that the Right to Know is an integral part
of the Right to Life

and unless one has the Right to Information the Right to Life cannot
be exercised

2

.

Why a specific legislation?

In addition to recognising this right as a fundamental guarantee, it
is necessary to enact an

enabling law, which will operationalise this Fundamental Right. This
essentially means that

there is a specific need to enact legislation that will put in place a
system through which

government information can be accessed.

The Developments in India

The demand for RTI laws has been growing with time. While there have been some

significant developments at the state level, the central government
has been dragging its feet

on the issue.

In 1994, the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS), started a
grassroots campaign for the

right to information in Rajasthan. Emerging from a struggle for
minimum wages and land

rights, the movement drew a clear link between the denial of rights to
the persons in the

1 South Africa, Nepal, Ghana are some of the countries that guarantee
the Right to Information as a

fundamental right.

2 Reliance Petrochemicals Ltd. vs Proprietors of Indian Express, AIR 1989 SC 190

Page 3

community, the corruption in the administration and the right to
information. This

movement grew and the campaign resulted in the government of Rajasthan
enacting a law

on the Right to Information in 2000.

Prior to the Rajasthan Act, as early as 1997, Tamil Nadu and Goa
became the first states to

enact laws on Right to Information. Maharashtra and Karnataka also
enacted their respective

RTI law in 2000. The most recent entrant in this league has been the
National Capital

Territory of Delhi, which enforced the Delhi RTI Act in 2001. In 1998,
the Madhya Pradesh

government enacted a law on the Right to Information, which did not
get enforced as the

Presidential assent was denied to it. Subsequently, the government has
issued executive

orders to more than 50 government departments directing them to
provide access to

information to the people. Uttar Pradesh government has also issue
similar orders on a pilot

basis, restricting them to a few departments.

At the central level there have been several initiatives for preparing
a law on the Right to

Information. The Consumer Education and Research Centre (CERC) was involved in

preparing a Bill, as also the Press Council of India. In 1997 the
central government set up a

Working Group on Right to Information and Transparency under the
chairmanship of Shri

H.D Shourie to look into the feasibility and need for a Right to
Information legislation. The

working group submitted its report in May that year with a draft Bill
titled the Freedom of

Information Bill 1997 (1997 Bill). The 1997 Bill was modified by the
government and placed

before the cabinet which referred the same to a Group of Ministers
(GOM) – the 1997 Bill

remained with the GOM from October 1997 to February 2000. In July
2000, the Freedom

of Information Bill, 2000 (“Bill”) was introduced in the Lok Sabha.
This Bill was referred to

the Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Home
Affairs (“Committee”)

by the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha in consultation with the Speaker of
the Lok Sabha in

September 2000 for examination and report.

The Standing Committee deliberated on the Bill after hearing the views
of the Secretary,

Ministry of Personal and Public Grievances and various individuals and
organisations

working on the issue. The Committee presented a Report, which was
placed before both

houses of parliament on July 25, 2001 (Report).

1

Since then the process has once again gone

behind closed door and one does not really know what has been happening.

What should the Law say?

There is a great deal of debate on the content of the law. Civil
society is agitating for a law

that will be people friendly and will ensure that much information is
put in public domain.

Unfortunately, the laws that are being enacted are a far cry from the
demands of civil society

in India. To be a strong law on the Right to Information, the
following minimum elements

must be present:

1. Duty on the Government: Iron cast duty on the government and public
bodies to give

information to any person seeking the same.

2. Inclusion of Private bodies: Apart from the government and public
bodies, there are

strong arguments for the inclusions of private bodies as well. Today
the private bodies

1 A copy of the Report can be view at out Website, www.humanrightsinitiative.org

Page 4

also influence and affect public life in a great number of ways. This
is more true now in

the context of the on going privatisation of public corporations and
the growing role of

private bodies in areas of infrastructure and public services, like
power, telecom etc. The

Bhopal Gas Tragedy is a strong example of the havoc the activities of
a private body can

play on the lives of common people. Therefore, information relevant to
public interest,

public health and environmental safety must be made accessible to the
general public

from private bodies. Goa RTI Act is the only one in India, which
brings in private

bodies under the obligations of the its RTI Act to provide information
to the public.

2

3. Access as general rule: Clearly stating access to information as
the rule and refusal as

the exception is an essential for removing any doubt that access to
information is an

inherent right of the people in a modern democratic society, that
cannot be denied on

mere administrative discretion. This will mean that the government duty bound to

disclose/provide information to the public as norm and refuse
information only in

defined, narrow and exceptional circumstances.

4. Minimum and narrow Exemptions: The list of information that cannot
be disclosed

to the public (generally known as ‘exemptions’) must be minimal,
specific and narrowly

defined. The usual list includes categories like defence related
information, information

which can harm the law and order situation, commercial secrets, etc.
The Constitution

of India allows only reasonable restrictions to be applied to the
fundamental freedom of

speech and expression. The courts have also read these restrictions
strictly and the same

logic has to apply to the right to information as it is an accepted
part of the freedom of

speech and expression. Therefore, the law must not contain a long list
of exceptions

couched in terms general enough to ensure that all kinds of
information can be refused

taking the help of the law itself. This has happened in the case of
the Tamil Nadu right

to Information Act which has all of 22 exceptions, and the Shourie
draft Bill, which,

along with numerous exceptions contains an all-pervasive clause that
information can be

denied, viz, “If its disclosure does not subserve any public purpose”.
A Right to

Information does not need to disclose any specific need. If a person
must show public

purpose every time he seeks information, it would give unlimited
discretion to public

bodies to refuse information.

Here also the debate of protection of privacy becomes relevant. The
law has to take into

account the protection of an individual’s privacy. Personal
information held by the

government must be exempt from disclosure. However, if the public interest in

disclosure in the public interest greatly outweighs the preservation
of individual privacy,

then disclosure should be allowed. Goa, Karnataka and New Delhi Act contain

provisions for exemption of private information subject to larger
public interest.

5. Application process: The application (the request for information)
process has to be

clearly defined and a definite official must be identified and made
responsible for

accepting the application and to process the same and provide the
information or a

2 The new Promotion of Access to Information Act, 2000 in South Africa
dedicates an entire segment of the

Act to access of information from Private bodies. It clearly states
the right of a person to access to

information (in certain cases) held by private bodies and provides in
detail for a person to approach any

private body and request for information.

Page 5

reasoned refusal, as the case maybe. Generally, written applications
or requests are

required seeking information, but there may be legitimate cases where
the person seeking

the information cannot write without assistance or write at all,
especially in a country

where illiteracy is widespread. In this case, the law must stipulate
that oral requests

should be accepted and where reasonable assistance is required to help
the person write

a request, the assistance must be provided. In this respect, the
central FOI Bill puts the

burden on the government official to reduce the oral request into
writing. The law in

Goa and Delhi also take into account oral requests.

6. Time Limit for administrative response: The response time to the
application has to

be reasonable and timely. If excessive time were allowed to the
administration to reply to

the application or provide information it would nullify the
requirement of timely

information. For example, in cases of urgent information requirement
like in matters of

custody or emergency medical situations etc., information delayed is
information denied

and an information giving mechanism for the benefit of the people
losses its meaning.

This kind of situation is not satisfied in most Indian RTI laws,
wherein the most

common time limit is of 30 days from the time of receipt of the application for

information. Only, the Goa RTI law provides for a situation of urgent
requirement of

information and it states that in cases of life or liberty, the
information must be provided

within 48 hours of the application for information. We believe that
this provision must

be incorporated in any RTI law to bring it closer to being a
responsive and effective

piece of legislation.

7. Fees: Most of the time a fee has to be paid for obtaining copies of
documents or any

other medium containing the desired information from the government.
This fee has to

be reasonable and provision for waiver in suitable cases must be
provided as well. This is

especially true in a country of abject and widespread poverty. The law
must set out the

basic guideline with respect to the upper limit of the fee, as it
cannot be left to the

discretion of the officials and it must be limited to the cost of
processing and making

available the information at the most. This will provide a space for
the officials to set fee

structure which will act as a deterring factor for asking information from the

government. The Rajasthan RTI Act and the Central FOI Bill, do not contain any

guideline with respect to an upper limit for the fee to be charged.

8. Suo motu Disclosures (Duty to Inform): A law on the Right to
Information must cast

a positive duty on government and public bodies to inform the public
in case of certain

projects and activities which relate to the public. This envisages
giving information

without being asked for it (by an application or request for
information). It must be

made mandatory to give out certain kinds of information on a mandatory
basis. This

kind of information would include the organisational structure of the government

department/public body, its governing rules and manual, functions,
information on

proposed projects and schemes, and other relevant information which
needs to be given

out and updated routinely. The Karnataka RTI Act and the Delhi RTI Act
impose this

obligation on the government authorities. The Central FOI Bill also
contains similar

disclosure clauses.

9. Independent Appeal Mechanism: The information seeker must be provided an

independent remedial mechanism to redress any grievance from the response to the

Page 6

application for information. One core idea involved in the Right to
Information is to pry

open the administration and subject it to public scrutiny and make the
government

accountable to the people. This objective is completely lost where
there is a complete

lack of an appeal mechanism or it is within the establishment itself.
It is of vital

importance for the success of an RTI law for the appellate authority to be an

independent agency separate from the government, which will deal with
any appeal in an

unbiased and efficacious manner. Some Acts in India provide for an independent

appellate body like, Karnataka Act, the Goa Act, the Rajasthan Act and
the Delhi Act.

The appellate body itself varies, for example Goa and Karnataka
(appeal at the second

instance) lie to the State Administrative Tribunal, whereas in Delhi
the appeal lies to the

Public Grievances Commission. In the Tamil Nadu Act, Maharashtra Act
and the central

FOI Bill, the appeal mechanism is restricted to within the
administration itself.

10. Penalties: The provision for an independent appeal mechanism is
essential for

providing a remedial mechanism for the person seeking information. But
to deter the

official and persons responsible for providing the information from
unnecessarily

harassing, delaying or intentionally denying or providing wrong or inaccurate

information, adequate provision for penalties must be fit into the
legislation. Most of the

laws in India that have penalty clause provide for disciplinary action
against the erring

government personnel in case of delay or wrongful denial of
information. The central

FOI Bill, Tamil Nadu Act and Maharashtra Act sorely lack in this respect with no

penalty clause at all.

11. Independent Monitoring Agency: Without continued and independent
monitoring the

RTI law will become a dead-letter law. It is important that an
independent agency is

made responsible to monitor and review the functioning of the law,
provide advice to

the government on all matters related to the promotion of right to information,

undertake documentation and research with respect to information
management of the

government with a view to improve the same, devise training and orientation of

government employees on the culture of openness and transparency etc.
Goa and Delhi

Acts have constituted a body with the responsibility of monitoring and
reviewing the law

called the State Council for Right to Information. Typically this body
constitutes of

members from the government, representatives from the media, civil
society, business

section, etc.

12. Protection of Whistleblowers: The RTI law must contain protection
for public officials

who give certain exempted information where it is necessary to do so
in overwhelming

public interest or to disclose some serious corrupt practice, etc.
This gives honest and

alert officers the safety and assurance from fear of reprisal to come
out with information

in public interest or expose corruption and malpractice in government.
All the RTI laws

in India, except the Karnataka Act, provide for the protection of any
person against any

legal proceeding for anything done in good faith in pursuance of the
respective RTI law.

13. Publicity and Training: The law must contain a mandatory procedure
for publicising

its contents. Often, laws are passed without their knowledge
percolating down without

sufficient speed or impact and therefore fail to bring about the
desired change in the

systems. The Right to Information law must also contain a strong
aspect of training and

orientation of public servants at all levels, in order to bring about
an effective change in

Page 7

the culture of secrecy and unwillingness to part with information. There are no

provisions in any of the RTI laws in the country, which provide for
suitable publication

and awareness building amongst the people regarding the law.

Problems with the Indian Law on RTI

As it emerges from the discussion above, the legislation that have
been enacted by the states

as also the central Bill do not contain all the important components
of a law on the right to

information. For instance the Goa and the Tamil Nadu law do not
contain provisions on the

duty to provide information. The Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu laws have
a long list of

exceptions that keep out a lot of information from public domain. The
central FOI Bill is

also very week, and in certain aspects it does not even stand at par
with its counterpart in the

States. For example, the FOI Bill does not contain any independent
appeals mechanism nor

does it contain any penalties. It further fails to provide for an
independent monitoring

agency.

Neither the laws enacted by the various states nor the FOI Bill being
considered by the

central government are satisfactory, as these laws keep a large area
of information away from

the purview of the public. There is no uniformity or consistency
amongst the various state

laws that have been enacted. That is why there is a demand that the
central government must

make a law which applies uniformly to the whole country and sets out
clear procedure for

getting information

3

. It is also important for the central FOI Bill to be a strong law setting

out the minimum standards with regards to the components discussed
earlier, for example

setting out a reasonable time limit for response from administration
in cases of urgent

request for information. This will mean that the States will also have
to confirm to the

minimum standards set out in the central law and therefore, certain
definite minimum

standards will be assured to all information seekers in the country.

The process of law making itself in most cases has been
non-participatory. The laws made by

the government have been passed without much discussion or debate and
without taking

into consideration people’s views on the issue. As a result of this,
the laws are not people

friendly and the common person is not aware of existence of
legislation, which is meant for

their benefit.

Conclusion

The realisation of Human Rights is dependent on a democratic society,
where the people are

empowered with information and knowledge, are able to scrutinise the
functioning of their

government and are capable of participating in a meaningful manner in
the governance of

the community. To this end, the RTI law is a tool, as it gives
entitlement and the mechanism

to obtain information from the government with which citizens can
become empowered by

acquiring a weapon to hold the government accountable, participate in
governance and

exercise their rights.

It must be kept in mind that mere enactment of a law does not mean
that government will

start implementing it in an effective manner. Civil society
organisations, NGO’s and others

have a responsibility to ensure effective implementation. The same is
true for the

3 Detailed analysis of the state laws can be found on the CHRI website
www.humanrightsinitiative.org

Page 8

implementation of the RTI law as well. They have an important role to
play, for example, in

using the law for the benefit of the people, disseminating
information, analysing information,

generate debate on various issues and in carrying the voice of the
voiceless to policy makers.

……………………..DECLARATION………………………

Name : ………………………NAGARAJA.M.R.

Address : ……………….LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP
WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL , MYSORE – 570017 INDIA

Professional / Trade Title : S.O.S – e – Voice For Justice

Periodicity : WEEKLY

Circulation : FOR FREE DISTRIBUTION ON WEB

Donations : NOT ACCEPTED. Self financing . Never accepted any
donations , subscriptions either for ourselves or on behalf of other
organizations / individuals .

Monetary gains : nil , never made any monetary gain by way of
advertisements on my websites or web news paper or otherwise.

Owner/editor/printer/publisher : NAGARAJA.M.R.

Nationality : INDIAN

Body Donation : Physical Body of Nagaraja M R , Editor , S.O.S- e –
clarion of Dalit & S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice is donated to JSS Medical
College , Mysore ( Donation No. 167 dated 22 / 10 / 2003 ) , In case
of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal
nexus , my body must be handed over to JSS Medical College , Mysore
for the study purposes of medical students.

Eye Donation : Both EYES of Nagaraja M R , Editor , S.O.S- e – clarion
of Dalit & S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice are donated to Mysore Eye Bank ,
Mysore , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the
hands of criminal nexus , my eyes must be handed over to Mysore Eye
Bank , Mysore WITHIN 6 Hours for immediate eye transplantation to the
needy.

Home page :

http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/sosevoiceforjustice/ ,
http://groups.google.co.in/group/hrwepaper / ,
http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice / ,
https://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com / ,
http://naghrw.tripod.com/evoice/ ,

http://e-voiceofhumanrightswatch.blogspot.com , http://paper.li/f-1368369249

Contact : naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com ,

UID Aadhaar No : 5703 5339 3479

Cell : 91 9341820313

I ,NAGARAJA.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are
true to the best of my knowledge & belief. If i am repeatedly called
to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the
losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation ,
job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB
personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of
injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the
guilty culprits even once to police station for questioning , as the
culprits are high & mighty . this type of one sided questioning must
not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward
happens to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with
hit & run accidents , loss of lives , death due to improper medical
care , etc , the jurisdictional police , revenue officials , District
Magistrate & Chief Justice of India together with above mentioned
accused public servants will be responsible for it. Even if criminal
nexus levels fake charges , police file fake cases against me or my
dependents to silence me , this complaint is & will be effective.

If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental
rights , human rights , denied proper medical care for ourselves , If
anything untoward like hit & run cases , murder attempts , unnatural
deaths , etc happens to me or to my dependents or to my family members
– In such case Chief Justice of India together with the jurisdictional
revenue & police officials will be responsible for it , in such case
the government of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as compensation
to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the
criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian
Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as
land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty
police officials , guilty Judges , guilty public servants & guilty
Constitutional fuctionaries.

date : 03.06.2015..………………………..Your’s sincerely,

place : India……………………………………Nagaraja.M.R.

Edited, printed , published owned by NAGARAJA.M.R. @ # LIG-2 No
761,HUDCO FIRST STAGE ,

OPP WATER WORKS , LAXMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL ,MYSURU – 570017 KARNATAKA INDIA

Cell : 91 9341820313 , 91 8970318202

Home page :

http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/sosevoiceforjustice/ ,
http://groups.google.co.in/group/hrwepaper / ,

http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice / ,
https://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com / ,

http://naghrw.tripod.com/evoice/ ,

http://e-voiceofhumanrightswatch.blogspot.com ,

http://paper.li/f-1368369249 ,

Contact : naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com ,

http://www.amnesty.org/en/user/naghrw

A Member of Amnesty International

Advertisements
Standard